The Biology Of Becoming: The Advancement Of Structural Capability

The earlier papers in this series changed what question is possible to ask here. Unlocking Access showed that a human being can contain capacities that are already present but not equally available in every state. The Physiology of Expenditure showed that fear, vigilance, suppression, and internal conflict require biological work, so healing can change not only how a person feels but how much effort the body has to spend maintaining that way of living. Borrowed States then showed that qualities first reached through an outside route can sometimes become increasingly natural as the person changes, while The Creation of Purpose followed what happens when less of a person's life is organized around fear and compensation and more of their experience can work together in a coherent direction.

By this point in the series, the main problem is no longer simply that useful capacity is blocked. The person may already have greater access to attention, emotion, creativity, authenticity, connection, and insight; they may spend less energy fighting themselves; and they may be living in a way that repeatedly asks those capacities to be used. That creates a different question. If consciousness begins operating in ways the body has rarely or never had to sustain before, can the biology that carries those states remain exactly the same?

A familiar example makes the problem easier to see. Someone can become strong enough to lift a heavier weight only because repeated demand changes the body that is doing the lifting. Practice does not merely reveal strength that was hidden forever; over time it can build new strength. The same distinction matters here. Earlier papers were largely concerned with access to what is already present. This paper asks what happens when greater access itself becomes a new demand and the organism has to become more capable in order to keep supporting it.

The phrase structural capability will be used for that idea. Structure does not mean only the visible shape of bones and organs. A living body is structured at many levels: the thickness of tissue, the connections among nerve cells, the populations of immune cells that remain after an infection, the way genes are turned up or down, the organization of cellular energy systems, and the patterns through which larger networks coordinate. Structural capability is what the organism can reliably do because of how those parts have been organized. If that organization changes in a lasting way, capability can change with it.

1. The Body Builds Capacity by Changing Itself

The simplest examples are the ones we can see. If the same patch of skin is rubbed repeatedly, the outer layer can thicken into a callus. If muscle is repeatedly asked to produce more force than it is accustomed to, training can increase muscle size and strength. Bone also remodels according to the loads placed upon it, changing its structure in response to repeated mechanical demand. The body does not merely endure the same challenge more bravely. Part of the body that meets the challenge becomes different. [1-3]

The same principle extends beyond structures we can see from the outside. Repeated exposure to heat can change sweating, circulation, fluid balance, and other processes that help a person tolerate hot conditions, while time at high altitude can change breathing and blood in ways that improve the delivery of the smaller amount of oxygen available there. These changes are called acclimation or acclimatization, meaning that the organism adjusts to conditions it repeatedly encounters. [4,5]

Experience can also change the nervous system. Neurons are the cells that carry much of the brain's electrical and chemical signaling, and the junctions through which they communicate are called synapses. Learning can strengthen, weaken, create, or remove connections within those networks, a process researchers describe as neural plasticity. The brain that has practiced something for years is therefore not simply the same structure making a better decision each time; repeated experience can alter the organization through which the task is performed. [6]

Biology can even use one challenge to prepare for another. In ischemic preconditioning, a brief period of reduced blood flow, called ischemia, can activate protective responses that reduce damage from a later and longer period of reduced blood flow. [7] The mechanism differs from a callus, muscle growth, or neural learning, but the larger pattern is the same: a demand reveals that the present organization has limits, the organism responds, and successful adaptation can leave behind greater capability than existed before.

That pattern adds something important to the earlier papers in this series. Removing fear, suppression, and other forms of interference can reveal capacities that were already there, but revealing a capacity and repeatedly living from it are not the same event. Once a person begins using a wider range of their attention, emotional openness, creativity, perception, or self-regulation as an ordinary way of living, the body may be exposed to demands that were previously occasional, temporary, or inaccessible. Access can therefore become the beginning of a second process: the development of structure capable of sustaining what has become available.

2. What Evolution Shows About New Capability

There is another biological story that appears to be about something entirely different. Viruses are usually introduced as threats because many of them enter cells, use the cells' machinery to reproduce, and can damage the organism they infect. That description is accurate, but it is not the whole history of the relationship between viruses and life.

Some ancient viruses inserted genetic material into the cells of organisms they infected. DNA is the chemical instruction set carried by cells, and a genome is the full collection of inherited DNA in an organism. Retroviruses are viruses that can copy their own genetic instructions into DNA and insert that DNA into a host cell. On rare occasions in evolutionary history, this happened in cells whose DNA was later passed to offspring. The viral sequence then became part of the inherited genome of the species. These inherited remnants are called endogenous retroviruses, and ancient retroviral material accounts for roughly eight percent of the human genome. [8]

Much of that material no longer behaves like an active virus, yet some of it has been repurposed. One of the clearest examples is syncytin, a protein produced from an ancient retroviral gene. Retroviral envelope proteins normally help viral and cellular membranes fuse. In humans, syncytin was repurposed for a different job: helping placental cells fuse during formation of the placenta, the temporary organ that supports a developing fetus during pregnancy. A mechanism inherited from an ancient virus therefore became part of human reproduction. [9]

The same broader pattern appears elsewhere in nature. Some viruses participate in relationships that increase a plant's tolerance of drought or heat, while polydnaviruses have become essential to the successful reproduction of some parasitoid wasps. These relationships are examples of mutualism, where an interaction that might be expected to be purely harmful can under some conditions contribute something useful to the host. [10]

Evolution therefore shows the long version of a principle already visible in ordinary adaptation: biology does not only preserve an existing design. Over time it can repurpose what is available, reorganize old machinery, incorporate new material, and produce capabilities that did not exist in the same form before. That does not mean an infection in one person's lifetime is the same thing as genetic evolution across generations. The timescale and mechanisms are different. What the comparison contributes is the larger direction. Living systems are capable of turning challenge, existing structure, and even foreign material into new function.

3. What One Challenge Can Leave Behind

Return now to a much shorter timescale. When a person becomes infected with a respiratory virus, the body changes how it operates. Immune cells become active, signaling chemicals increase, blood flow changes in affected tissues, mucus production rises, sleep and appetite may shift, and energy is redirected toward defense and repair. Once the infection clears, many of those temporary changes settle down. Yet successful recovery does not always mean that the organism returns to exactly the same biological starting point.

The clearest example is immune memory. The adaptive immune system can create B cells and T cells that recognize features of a particular pathogen, and some of those cells remain after recovery. If the same pathogen appears again, the body can respond differently because the previous encounter has been preserved in biological structure. The illness is gone, but information from the illness remains embodied in the cells that survived it.

Researchers have found a related form of lasting change in the innate immune system, the faster and more general branch of immunity that responds before a highly specific response has been built. This is called trained immunity. An earlier challenge can alter the metabolism and gene regulation of some innate immune cells, and even precursor cells in bone marrow that later produce immune cells, so that later responses are different. Gene regulation means changing how readily existing DNA instructions are used rather than changing the letters of the DNA itself. Metabolism is the set of processes through which cells obtain and use energy. In trained immunity, the body can therefore keep a record of an earlier challenge not only as a memory of one exact virus, but as a changed way of responding. [11]

Another concept, hormesis, describes a pattern in which a manageable stress activates protective changes that can increase resistance to later stress. A 2024 review applied this idea to infection and examined how infection-related stress can alter cellular protection and mitochondrial function. Mitochondria are structures inside cells that help convert nutrients into usable cellular energy, and they also participate in signaling and stress responses. The review did not claim that infection is automatically beneficial; an overwhelming infection can damage or kill tissue. Its importance here is that infection can sometimes be followed by adaptation rather than a perfect restoration of the previous state. [12]

This makes illness relevant to the larger developmental sequence in a more precise way. A challenge can require the organism to solve a problem it could not simply ignore. If recovery succeeds, the solution may leave a trace in immune organization, cellular regulation, energy use, or other systems. The body has not merely returned from sickness to health. In at least some respects, it may have become a different healthy body than the one that entered the challenge.

4. From Adaptation to Structural Advancement

Most adaptations are small enough that they do not look like a new human capability. A callus does not create a new state of consciousness, and immune memory does not by itself produce enlightenment. The question becomes more interesting when these changes are placed inside the developmental process established by the earlier papers.

Unlocking Access proposed that human biology contains more usable range than ordinary consciousness normally reaches. The Physiology of Expenditure then argued that chronic protection can consume resources that become available when the reason for that protection resolves. Borrowed States showed how a state that once required outside assistance can become increasingly natural, while The Creation of Purpose described what can happen when experience, skill, interest, and healing become coherent enough that a person's life begins repeatedly expressing a deeper direction. At that point, increased capacity is not merely being discovered during an unusual moment. It is being used.

Repeated use changes the problem. A person who can access an unusually clear, creative, emotionally open, perceptive, or integrated state for ten minutes is asking something different of the body than a person who begins living from that state for hours, days, and eventually as a new baseline. What was once a temporary possibility becomes an ongoing physiological demand. Attention has to remain organized differently, emotion has to be regulated without the old defensive strategies, more information may have to be integrated, and the person may be creating, communicating, and acting at a level that previously appeared only in short bursts.

The theory developed here proposes that this is one way biological advancement can occur within a lifetime. Advancement does not mean that every change is an improvement or that the body moves toward a predetermined ideal after every stress. It means that successful adaptation can increase structural capability: the organism becomes able to support an activity, state, or level of demand that previously exceeded what its existing organization could sustain. Muscle does this with force, bone with load, the nervous system with practiced skill, and the immune system with previously encountered challenge. The larger proposal is that the same principle may participate in the development of the organism that carries increasingly integrated states of being.

Earlier papers already established the phase-change model, so it does not need to be rebuilt here. The important point is simply that accumulated changes can remain individually small while together preparing the conditions for a different stable state. If one hundred changes are required, change ninety-nine can still look almost indistinguishable from change ninety-eight; the final change matters because it completes the conditions that allow the whole system to reorganize. Complex dynamical systems can cross critical thresholds in this way, shifting abruptly into a different regime after underlying conditions have changed gradually. [13]

That model gives structural capability a developmental role. A new state does not have to appear because one dramatic event suddenly created it from nothing. Years of healing, learning, practice, relationships, illness, recovery, creative work, and other forms of adaptation could each alter part of the biological system. Most changes may be too small to identify as 'the' transition. Their significance would lie in what they make possible together.

5. What Gives Development a Direction

Adaptation explains how biology can become more capable, but it raises another question. The body is exposed to thousands of demands across a lifetime, and those demands do not all point in the same direction. Some are brief, some repeat for years, some consume resources without building anything useful, and others continually call the same capacities into use. If structural capability advances according to what the organism is repeatedly required to sustain, then the pattern of those requirements matters because it helps determine what the body is being asked to become capable of doing.

The earlier papers supply an important distinction. The Physiology of Expenditure described fear, vigilance, suppression, self-monitoring, and other protective responses as forms of ongoing work. Healing can reduce those demands when the reason for the protection changes. The Creation of Purpose then followed what becomes possible when less of a person's life is organized around protection and compensation. Interests that remain after the need to prove worth, gain approval, or escape discomfort has weakened can begin organizing attention, practice, creativity, and action around a more coherent direction.

Those two movements create very different kinds of biological demand. Healing removes work that the organism no longer needs to perform, while purpose creates work that the person repeatedly chooses because it expresses what they are becoming. Someone who spends years writing, teaching, building, meditating, solving a particular kind of problem, caring for others, or developing a method is not merely thinking about a purpose. They are repeatedly recruiting the attention, memory, perception, emotional regulation, communication, motor patterns, and other capacities required to live it. The same direction is practiced again and again, which gives adaptation something consistent to organize around.

A muscle does not need to know why a weight is being lifted in order to adapt to repeated force, and bone does not need to understand why a particular load keeps returning. Biology responds to the demand itself. Purpose could influence development in the same ordinary way. It would not have to function as a mysterious instruction telling the body what a higher state should look like. By repeatedly asking particular capacities to work together at a greater level, a person's way of living could become the training condition to which the organism adapts. The body receives a much simpler message: this is what now has to be sustained.

This gives structural advancement a direction without requiring every challenge to contribute equally. Illness may sometimes force adaptation, learning may reorganize neural networks, meditation may repeatedly recruit unusual forms of attention and regulation, and relationships may place their own demands on emotional and physiological systems, but purpose can hold many of those changes inside a continuing pattern of use. The person is not simply collecting random adaptations. More and more of the organism is being asked to support a coherent way of perceiving, creating, relating, regulating, and acting.

The process can then become recursive. Greater access allows a person to live and create in ways that were previously unavailable. Repeated use of those capacities creates new biological demands. Successful adaptation increases structural capability, which allows the person to sustain more, work with more information, remain in a state longer, or express what they are becoming more fully. Those new possibilities then create demands that did not exist at the earlier level, beginning another round of adaptation. Becoming is therefore not one leap from an ordinary body into a finished higher state. It is a continuing exchange in which greater capability changes what can be lived, and what is lived gives biology new reasons to change.

Seen from this angle, illness is not the engine of the process. Demand is the engine, and adaptation is the biological response. Illness is one especially intense kind of demand that may sometimes leave useful changes behind, but the larger developmental pressure comes from the whole life the organism is being asked to sustain. Once purpose begins organizing that life, the body may no longer be adapting only to survive what happens to it. It may also be adapting to support what the person is actively becoming.

6. Integration Turns Challenge into Development

A challenge does not advance the organism simply because it happened. Exercise can stimulate stronger tissue, but the lasting change appears through what follows the strain, when the body repairs and rebuilds. Learning can briefly activate a neural pattern, but development depends on structural plasticity that preserves part of what was learned. An immune encounter matters developmentally when the response leaves memory or altered future responsiveness behind. Across these examples, the event creates pressure, while integration determines whether anything useful becomes part of the organism's new baseline. [2,3,6,11,12]

Integration, as the word is used here, means that a change has been incorporated well enough that the system does not have to recreate it from the beginning each time. The body returns from disruption carrying something forward. A muscle can produce more force, an immune system can respond differently, a neural pathway can be recruited more readily, or a previously difficult state can be sustained with less effort. The important change is therefore not the intensity of the challenge but the capability that remains after recovery.

This distinction is essential when illness is placed inside a developmental model. Becoming sick does not automatically advance anything. An infection that only injures, exhausts, or destabilizes the organism has not become developmental merely because it was difficult. For illness to contribute to structural advancement, some useful adaptation would have to survive the illness and become integrated into future functioning. The same rule applies psychologically: an intense experience can overwhelm a person without being understood or incorporated, while another experience can reorganize how later situations are processed. Challenge supplies the opportunity for change; integration is what converts change into development.

That also explains why periods of recovery matter. If demand is the signal that something more is required, recovery is the period in which the organism can reorganize around that requirement. Development therefore depends on a rhythm of demand, adaptation, recovery, and integration rather than an endless accumulation of stress. What becomes part of the new baseline is what can support the next stage.

7. When the Body Has to Catch Up

So far, this argument can be read in one direction: biological changes accumulate until the body becomes capable of sustaining a state that was previously unavailable. The sequence established by the earlier papers creates another possibility. Consciousness may sometimes move first.

A person can enter a period in which insight, awareness, perception, creativity, emotional openness, or purpose suddenly intensifies beyond what had been ordinary for them. The change may not feel like learning one more fact or improving one familiar skill. Several capacities may begin operating together at once: old experiences connect into larger patterns, ideas arrive faster than they can be recorded, previously frightening emotions can be experienced without the same resistance, and creative work that once required deliberate effort begins to organize itself around a coherent direction. If those changes are carried through a biological organism, then a new level of conscious functioning also becomes a new biological demand.

In that case, illness or instability appearing during the same period could have a different place in the theory. The illness would not need to create the expanded state. It could represent the organism being forced to adapt after the change has already begun, much as a person who suddenly increases physical training creates demands that muscles, connective tissue, circulation, and energy systems must gradually learn to support. Consciousness would be ahead of the body's established baseline, while recovery and adaptation would be part of making the new level of functioning easier to sustain.

This possibility changes the meaning of the phrase 'the body has to catch up.' It does not imply that consciousness exists separately from biology and waits for a slower body to follow. It means that the whole person can change unevenly. Some networks, capacities, or ways of organizing experience may shift first, while other systems still have to remodel around the new demands. Biology already behaves this way during training and development: one change can expose the need for another until the larger system becomes coordinated around what it is now being asked to do.

The two pathways can therefore meet from opposite directions. Sometimes structural change may come first and open access to a state that was not previously sustainable. At other times a new state may appear first and expose the biological work still required to make that state ordinary. In both cases, the process ends in the same place: a temporary possibility becomes a stable capability because the organism has changed enough to carry it.

8. Where the Change Appears

If the body is reorganizing around new demands, another question follows naturally: would the location of physical strain tell us anything about the kind of capacity being developed? Human beings already use bodily function as part of how abstract experience is understood. We speak of carrying a heavy responsibility, losing our voice, seeing someone's point, standing our ground, or being unable to stomach an idea because physical experience gives the mind a structure for making less visible experience understandable. Researchers often discuss this broader relationship through embodied cognition, the idea that thinking and meaning are partly shaped by the systems through which a person senses and acts in the world. [14]

The brain also receives a continual stream of information from inside the body. This is called interoception: sensing heartbeat, breathing, pressure, temperature, tension, pain, hunger, and the condition of internal organs. [15] Studies of bodily maps of emotion show that different emotions are consistently experienced through different patterns of bodily sensation rather than as events that occur only in abstract thought. [16] These findings do not prove that a physical symptom has one fixed symbolic meaning, but they establish something more basic that the next paper in this series will develop further: bodily function and bodily sensation are already part of how psychological experience becomes conscious.

That creates a way to examine illness during an unusually intense developmental period without turning every symptom into a dictionary. The useful question is not whether a sore throat always means expression or whether a headache always means too much thinking. It is whether the physical function of the systems under strain fits the kind of demand that has recently increased.

The brain brings information from many sources into patterns that can become thought, memory, and understanding. During a period in which someone is making connections at an unusually high rate, symptoms centered in the head could therefore correspond symbolically with the demand for greater integration. The throat has a different relationship to the process because the larynx and surrounding structures help turn what is internal into voice; when insight is being translated rapidly into speech, writing, teaching, or explanation, throat symptoms can fit the demand for expression. The lungs carry yet another function. Breathing is a continuous exchange with the outside world, bringing something in, releasing something out, and sustaining the organism through an ongoing relationship with its environment. That makes the lungs a natural symbol for the point where an idea stops being private and begins to live through continued action and exchange.

A theory can exist silently in someone's mind and later be given a voice through language, but when it becomes a project, a method, a business, or something other people begin using, it has entered a different kind of existence because it now has to interact with the world and continue beyond the moment in which it was conceived. The throat gives an idea a voice; the lungs give it breath. If physical symptoms cluster in systems whose ordinary functions closely match the capacities being stretched during the same period, the pattern may offer information about the direction of the adaptation rather than a universal symbolic code.

This is where The Biology of Becoming reaches the next paper in the series. If biological change can begin before conscious language has explained what is happening, and if the body can become the first place that change is felt, then sensation itself may carry information about processes that the conscious mind has not yet named. The next question is no longer only how the body changes. It is how the body communicates what is changing.

9. Why Enlightenment Would Be Rare

The same model gives a practical reason that a stable state described as enlightenment would be rare. Biology adapts to what it is repeatedly asked to do. Understanding a higher state, admiring it, or briefly experiencing it does not create the same demand as living in a way that requires the organism to sustain it. Action therefore has to precede much of the biological change. A person may have to act from greater honesty before honesty is effortless, remain present when old defenses would normally take over, repeatedly choose work that expresses purpose, learn to experience emotion without fighting it, and continue using capacities that may initially be tiring or unstable. Repeated action turns a possibility into a demand, and the demand gives the body something to adapt to.

That requirement changes the question of why enlightenment appears so infrequently. The earlier papers describe two conditions that would have to develop together. First, enough psychological conflict has to resolve that the organism is not continually spending large amounts of energy on fear, suppression, self-monitoring, protection, and compensation. Second, the person needs a sufficiently authentic direction that the freed capacity is repeatedly used rather than simply left available. Psychological stability removes much of the old demand; purpose supplies a coherent new demand. Without the first, the organism remains occupied maintaining survival-oriented patterns. Without the second, there is no consistent direction around which greater capability needs to organize.

Many lives never hold both conditions for long. People can spend years meeting external demands for income, approval, productivity, conformity, or basic security while having little opportunity to resolve the internal patterns consuming their capacity or to organize daily action around what they most deeply value. A society can therefore produce enormous amounts of activity without producing the particular kind of sustained developmental demand described here. A person may meditate occasionally, experience a brief awakening, discover a purpose they cannot yet live, or understand profound ideas without restructuring everyday life around them. From the body's perspective, the demand remains intermittent, so there is less reason for the organism to rebuild itself around that state.

Within this model, enlightenment would not be rare because only a few people were chosen or because the state were biologically impossible. It would be rare because the chain of conditions needed to make it stable is itself rare: psychological stability, authentic direction, sustained action, repeated biological demand, successful adaptation, recovery, and integration. Remove any link and a person may still glimpse the state without creating the conditions that make it ordinary.

This also gives sustained spiritual practice a different interpretation. Meditation, ethical action, service, disciplined attention, truthful expression, and other repeated practices would matter not simply because they symbolize a spiritual ideal, but because they repeatedly require the person to inhabit the capacities associated with that ideal. The action comes first often enough for biology to be forced to follow. Enlightenment, in that sense, would be less like receiving a revelation and more like becoming structurally capable of living what repeated action has demanded.

10. The Biology of Becoming

The progression across this series can now be seen as one continuous developmental movement. First, capacities that already exist can become more accessible when fear, stress, inhibition, or other forms of interference change. As healing reduces the work of chronic protection, the organism can spend less energy maintaining internal conflict. States that once appeared only temporarily can become more naturally embodied, and as compensation weakens, authentic interest and purpose can organize more of the person's attention, creativity, skill, and action around a coherent direction.

That shift changes the biological problem. Healing removes demands that no longer need to be carried, while purpose creates a different kind of demand by repeatedly calling meaningful capacities into use. Greater access is no longer only something the person experiences; it becomes something they live from. Attention has to remain organized, emotion has to be carried without the old defensive structure, insight has to be integrated, creation has to be expressed, and the body has to support that pattern often enough for it to become ordinary. The organism is therefore not simply becoming less burdened. It is being asked to become more capable.

The body already answers repeated demand by changing itself. Skin thickens, muscle and bone remodel, nervous systems reorganize through learning, immune encounters leave cellular memory, and manageable challenge can activate protective changes that alter future response. Evolution shows the same principle across a much longer timescale, where existing structures and even ancient viral material can be repurposed into new biological functions. The Biology of Becoming proposes that human development may draw on this same fundamental property of living systems: structure changes in response to what life repeatedly requires, successful integration carries useful changes into the new baseline, and that changed structure alters what the organism can reliably sustain.

This makes the process recursive rather than linear. Greater access can support a more coherent life; psychological stability frees the organism from demands that once consumed its resources; purpose directs the freed capacity into sustained action; repeated action creates new biological demands; adaptation and integration can increase structural capability; and greater structural capability can make new states, perceptions, expressions, and forms of work easier to sustain. Those possibilities then expose the organism to demands that did not exist at the earlier level. Development changes both sides of the relationship at once: what the person becomes capable of living changes what the body is asked to carry, while what the body becomes capable of carrying changes what the person can become next.

Illness belongs inside that process without becoming its center. A viral infection or another biological challenge can force intense adaptation, but it contributes to advancement only when useful change survives recovery and becomes integrated into future functioning. Learning, meditation, creative work, relationships, and the sustained expression of purpose can create other forms of repeated demand. Sometimes structural development may prepare the way for a new state before it appears; at other times the state may emerge first and reveal that the rest of the organism still has to catch up. In both directions, the important change is the same: a temporary possibility becomes a stable capability because the biology carrying it has reorganized and incorporated the change.

Becoming, in this sense, is not consciousness escaping the limits of the body and it is not the body advancing toward a finished ideal. It is a continuing biological process in which action creates demand, demand produces pressure for adaptation, integration carries successful change forward, and each new level of capability changes what can be lived next. The human body is therefore not merely the container in which development happens. It may be one of the things being developed, and the sensations that accompany that development may be among the first signs that another change is already underway.

Sources

[1] Freeman, D. B. (2002). Corns and calluses resulting from mechanical hyperkeratosis. American Family Physician, 65(11), 2277-2280.

[2] Currier, B. S., et al. (2026). American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. Resistance Training Prescription for Muscle Function, Hypertrophy, and Physical Performance in Healthy Adults: An Overview of Reviews. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 58(4), 851-872. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003897

[3] Hughes, J. M., Castellani, C. M., Popp, K. L., et al. (2020). The central role of osteocytes in the four adaptive pathways of bone's mechanostat. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 48(3), 140-148. https://doi.org/10.1249/JES.0000000000000225

[4] Deshayes, T. A., Sodabi, D. G. A., Dubord, M., & Gagnon, D. (2024). Shifting focus: Time to look beyond the classic physiological adaptations associated with human heat acclimation. Experimental Physiology, 109, 335-349. https://doi.org/10.1113/EP091207

[5] von Grünigen, K., Ulrich, S., Lichtblau, M., Mayer, L., & Furian, M. (2025). [Overview of the most important (patho)physiological mechanisms of high-altitude acclimatization in healthy individuals]. Therapeutische Umschau, 82(6), 202-208. https://doi.org/10.23785/TU.2025.06.006

[6] Caroni, P., Donato, F., & Muller, D. (2012). Structural plasticity upon learning: Regulation and functions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 478-490. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3258

[7] Eisen, A., Fisman, E. Z., Rubenfire, M., et al. (2004). Ischemic preconditioning: Nearly two decades of research. A comprehensive review. Atherosclerosis, 172(2), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9150(03)00238-7

[8] Kyriakou, E., & Magiorkinis, G. (2023). Interplay between endogenous and exogenous human retroviruses. Trends in Microbiology, 31(9), 933-946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2023.03.008

[9] Mi, S., Lee, X., Li, X., et al. (2000). Syncytin is a captive retroviral envelope protein involved in human placental morphogenesis. Nature, 403, 785-789. https://doi.org/10.1038/35001608

[10] Roossinck, M. J. (2011). The good viruses: Viral mutualistic symbioses. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 9, 99-108. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2491

[11] Netea, M. G., Domínguez-Andrés, J., Barreiro, L. B., et al. (2020). Defining trained immunity and its role in health and disease. Nature Reviews Immunology, 20, 375-388. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-020-0285-6

[12] Bauer, M., Ermolaeva, M., Singer, M., Wetzker, R., & Soares, M. P. (2024). Hormesis as an adaptive response to infection. Trends in Molecular Medicine, 30(7), 633-641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2024.04.012

[13] Scheffer, M., Bascompte, J., Brock, W. A., et al. (2009). Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature, 461, 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08227

[14] Galetzka, C. (2017). The story so far: How embodied cognition advances our understanding of meaning-making. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1315. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01315

[15] Craig, A. D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 655-666. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn894

[16] Nummenmaa, L., Glerean, E., Hari, R., & Hietanen, J. K. (2014). Bodily maps of emotions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(2), 646-651. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1321664111