Unlocking Access: The Hidden Range Of Human Biology
Updated: 2 days ago
Symbols in Stone ended with an ancient civilization treating human transformation as something real enough to organize religion, ritual, architecture, and enormous physical effort around it. Ancient Egyptian language described becoming, restoration, right order, and the akh, a transformed person capable of functioning in a different condition. The monuments then gave that possibility a physical setting.
That leaves a practical question for the next paper in the series. If a human being can become capable of a genuinely different state of consciousness, what would have to change in the human being?
The easiest place to begin is not with anything extraordinary. It is with something we already experience every day.
1. The Same Body Does Not Always Give Us the Same Access
Think about what happens when someone is overwhelmed. A problem that would normally be simple can suddenly become difficult. A familiar name can disappear. It becomes harder to hold several pieces of information in mind, harder to change strategies, and harder to see possibilities beyond the one that has already failed. Then the stress passes and the same person can think clearly again.
Nothing new had to be added to the brain. The ability was already there. The person's state changed how much of that ability could be used.
The first paper in this series, The Cosmic Game Theory of Consciousness, introduced this idea through psychology. Acute stress, meaning stress that rises strongly over a short period, has been found to reduce working memory and cognitive flexibility. Working memory is the ability to keep information available long enough to use it, while cognitive flexibility is the ability to change approaches when the first one is not working. A meta-analysis, which combines results from many studies, found that both become less effective under acute stress [1].
The opposite can happen when the internal state changes in a more positive direction. Fredrickson and Branigan found that positive emotions broadened attention, allowing people to take in a wider range of what was already around them [2]. Isen and colleagues found that positive emotion improved performance on problems requiring creative insight, where the solution depends on forming a connection that is not immediately obvious [3].
The room did not become richer in information. The person's eyes did not gain new receptors. Their brain did not grow a new structure during the experiment. A change in emotional state changed how much of the existing system could be used together.
Sleep gives another familiar example. Wagner and colleagues gave people a problem containing a hidden shortcut. After sleep, participants were more likely to discover that shortcut even though no one had taught it to them during the night [4]. The information had already been learned. Sleep changed how that information was organized, and a relationship that had previously remained hidden became easier to see.
Even internal conflict can consume capacity. Research on emotional suppression has found that deliberately holding emotional expression down can reduce later memory for what happened during the experience [5]. Part of the system is busy controlling another part, leaving less capacity available elsewhere.
These findings give us a simple biological starting point: the human body does not operate at one fixed level of access. The same anatomy can support different amounts of memory, creativity, attention, flexibility, and insight depending on the state of the person.
The body also helps create those states. Heart rhythm, breathing, blood pressure, and the nervous system continually influence one another. Heart-rate variability is the natural variation in the time between one heartbeat and the next. Slow, steady breathing can increase coordination among breathing, heart rhythm, and the autonomic nervous system, the system that regulates many automatic bodily functions [6]. Popular writing sometimes calls this kind of organized interaction heart-brain coherence. The measurable idea underneath the phrase is that several bodily rhythms can become more coordinated, changing the conditions in which the brain is operating.
Research has found a modest relationship between heart-rate variability and executive functions, the mental abilities used to direct attention, hold information in mind, stop an automatic response, and choose among possibilities [7]. Biofeedback, which shows a person a bodily signal in real time so they can learn to influence it, can also improve some measures of attention and self-control when used to train heart-rate variability [8].
The point is not that calmness turns someone into a different kind of human being. It is almost the opposite. A more regulated state can allow the same human being to use capacities that were already present more effectively.
Once that principle is clear in abilities we recognize, the next step becomes much less dramatic. We can ask what else the body may already be doing that ordinary consciousness does not fully use.
2. Conscious Experience Is Not a Complete List of What the Body Can Do
The Cosmic Game Theory already established that the nervous system processes far more information than conscious awareness can hold at once. This paper asks a more physical question: what kinds of capacities are hidden inside that larger processing system?
One unusual example comes from Earth's magnetic field. Magnetoreception means detecting magnetic information. Many animals use it for orientation. In human experiments, rotating Earth-strength magnetic fields produced measurable changes in brain activity even though participants did not consciously report sensing the magnetic change [9]. The body responded to something that ordinary awareness did not recognize.
Smell provides a less exotic example. Humans have two nostrils, and the brain can compare differences in odor arriving at each side. In experiments, people used these differences to help determine direction even when they could not consciously explain what they were comparing [10]. The information was useful before the process became conscious.
These examples belong to a much larger group. Some are capacities nearly everyone possesses, some are much stronger in certain people, some improve with training, and some appear only under unusual anatomical or laboratory conditions. Their importance is not that every person can simply practice until all of them become conscious. Their importance is that normal human biology already contains far more sensitivity and processing capacity than everyday experience reveals.
Known examples of existing human capacity
Echolocation: humans can learn to use returning echoes from self-made clicks to judge the location and shape of nearby objects, and training can recruit brain regions usually associated with vision [11].
Infrasound sensitivity: sound below the range normally heard as a clear tone can still affect hearing, balance, and bodily vibration under the right conditions [12].
Absolute pitch: some adults can learn highly accurate identification of musical notes without a reference tone, even though the ability is much more common after early musical exposure [13].
Microsecond sound timing: the auditory system can use differences of only millionths of a second in when sound reaches the two ears to help locate its source [14].
Fine vibration sensing: touch receptors can detect movements far smaller than anything visible to the eye.
Thermal discrimination: skin can detect small changes in temperature relative to the temperature it has adapted to [15].
Electric-field detection: strong enough electric fields can move fine body hairs, allowing ordinary touch receptors to detect the field indirectly [16].
Magnetic-field response: measurable brain responses to changes in Earth's magnetic field can occur without conscious magnetic sensation [9].
Proprioception: signals from muscles, joints, skin, and the inner ear allow the body to know where its parts are without looking at them.
Vestibular sensing: the balance organs of the inner ear detect rotation, acceleration, and head position so continuously that most of the process disappears into the ordinary feeling of knowing which way is up.
Single-photon detection: under tightly controlled conditions, people can detect the arrival of single packets of light above chance levels [17].
Near-ultraviolet sensitivity: the retina can respond to some ultraviolet wavelengths that the eye's natural lens normally filters before they reach it [18].
Infrared perception under special conditions: intense infrared light can create a visible sensation through a two-photon process in the eye even though humans do not normally see infrared [19].
Polarization perception: humans can learn to notice Haidinger's brush, a faint visual pattern that reveals the direction in which light is polarized [20][21].
Visual hyperacuity: with training, people can distinguish some spatial differences finer than the spacing of individual retinal receptors would seem to permit [22].
Expanded color discrimination: a small number of people have an additional functional distinction among cone cells and can discriminate color differences unavailable to ordinary three-cone vision [23].
Extreme olfactory sensitivity: human smell can detect very small concentrations of some chemicals, with large differences between individuals [24].
Scent tracking: humans can follow an odor trail through space and improve with practice [25].
Stereo olfaction: the two nostrils can provide directional information by comparing odor differences between them [10].
Social chemosignal processing: chemicals in human body odor can carry information related to emotion and social state that influences other people without requiring an obvious conscious smell [26].
Interoception: the nervous system continually receives information about heartbeat, breathing, pressure, temperature, tension, and the condition of internal organs, while only a portion becomes conscious experience [27].
Circadian light sensing: specialized cells in the eye help regulate the body's daily clock even though their main job is not creating the visual picture we consciously see.
Seen one at a time, these abilities can look like curiosities. Seen together, they change the picture of the human body. Ordinary awareness is not a complete inventory of what the organism can detect, compare, regulate, or learn to use.
3. A Brain Region's Usual Job Is Not Necessarily Its Full Capacity
So far, the examples have involved abilities that were already happening in the body but were either stronger than we normally realize or mostly hidden from conscious awareness. There is another way the body's capacity can remain hidden, and it is easy to miss because the biological machinery is not inactive at all. We may simply misunderstand what that machinery is capable of doing.
The brain contains many regions that are named after the jobs they usually perform. The visual cortex is associated with sight, the auditory cortex with hearing, and the motor cortex with movement. These names are useful because they describe what those areas normally do, but a name based on ordinary use does not necessarily describe everything the same tissue is capable of doing.
Think about the human hand. We could name it after any one of its common jobs, such as a grasping hand, because grasping is something hands do constantly. But the same hand can also write, point, feel texture, turn a key, carry something, catch something, or communicate through gesture. Watching only its most common behavior would give us an incomplete picture of what the structure itself can do.
The brain can work in a similar way. A region that spends most of a person's life processing information from the eyes will naturally appear to be built for vision. But that does not necessarily mean that receiving light from the eyes is the only kind of information that region can learn to organize. The deeper function of the tissue may be broader than the sense through which it is normally used.
The visual cortex gives us a striking example. It is the part of the brain most strongly associated with sight, yet trained echolocators can recruit portions of it while using sound to understand the shape and location of objects around them [11]. No light from those objects has to enter the eyes for brain tissue normally associated with vision to participate in building a spatial picture.
Sensory substitution makes this even clearer. Sensory substitution means taking information that would normally enter through one sense and translating it into a form another sense can receive. A camera, for example, can convert the shape and position of objects into changing patterns of sound. At first those sounds are only sounds. With practice, however, a person can learn that particular patterns correspond to lines, curves, letters, locations, and objects.
Something especially important happens as that skill develops. The brain does not necessarily keep the information confined to areas normally associated with hearing. In blind people trained to read words through sound, researchers found activity in a brain region normally involved in recognizing visually written words, even though the information had never entered through the eyes [28][29].
That changes what the label "visual cortex" means. The tissue may usually receive its information from vision, but at least some of what it actually does may be more general: recognizing shapes, organizing space, identifying patterns, or assigning meaning to structured information. Give the same biological hardware useful information through another route, along with enough practice to learn how to interpret it, and functions that appeared tied to one sense can begin operating through another.
This gives us a third way ordinary human functioning can underestimate the body's potential. A capacity does not have to be completely dormant or hidden from consciousness. Sometimes the hardware is already working every day, but ordinary life only asks it to perform a small part of what it can actually learn to do.
That matters for everything that follows. If familiar biological structures can reveal unfamiliar capabilities without the body growing new organs or new brain regions, then looking at what a structure normally does cannot by itself tell us the limits of what that structure can eventually do.
4. Automatic Does Not Always Mean Unreachable
The next boundary is even more familiar. The body performs thousands of tasks without conscious instruction. Pupils change size, blood vessels tighten and relax, immune cells respond to danger, body temperature is regulated, and goosebumps appear without anyone giving a command.
Much of this is coordinated by the autonomic nervous system, the part of the nervous system that regulates functions that usually happen automatically. The word automatic can sound as though these processes are permanently sealed away from conscious influence. Research shows that the boundary is more flexible than that.
With real-time feedback about pupil size, people can learn to influence how widely their pupils open, even though pupil size is normally regulated automatically [30]. Some people can deliberately produce goosebumps, a response called piloerection that usually occurs without conscious control [31]. Experienced g-Tummo meditators have produced measurable increases in body temperature through breathing and focused attention [32].
An especially striking experiment trained participants for ten days in breathing, meditation, and cold exposure. The participants then received a small dose of bacterial endotoxin, a substance used to trigger a temporary immune response under controlled conditions. During the challenge, the trained group produced unusually strong activation of the sympathetic nervous system, the branch that prepares the body for action, along with higher epinephrine and a reduced inflammatory response compared with untrained controls [33].
No one in that experiment consciously commanded an immune cell to change what it was doing. Conscious behavior altered breathing and nervous-system activity, which then changed processes deeper in the body. The route was indirect, but the result still matters: training moved the boundary of what conscious action could influence.
The organs, nerves, glands, and immune cells were already there. The new ability came from gaining a different kind of access to systems the body already knew how to operate.
5. Some Capacity Is Literally Present but Kept Quiet
So far, we have seen abilities become more or less available depending on state, information used without awareness, existing brain tissue recruited for unfamiliar work, and automatic functions becoming more influenceable. Neuroscience adds something even more literal: sometimes the physical connection already exists while remaining functionally quiet.
Neurons are the cells that carry much of the brain's electrical and chemical signaling. They communicate at tiny junctions called synapses. Some synapses are called silent synapses because the connection is physically present but does not respond to ordinary signaling in the same way as an active synapse. Under the right conditions, it can become functional. Research now describes silent synapses in the adult brain as a reserve of plasticity, where plasticity means the ability of the nervous system to change through experience [34].
Other capacities can be present but held down by inhibition. Inhibition is the brain's way of reducing activity in other neurons. It is essential because a brain in which every signal spread without restraint would become unusable noise. Yet inhibition also means that something can remain in the system without being strongly expressed. Barron and colleagues found that learned cortical associations that had become difficult to detect could be revealed again when the balance between excitation and inhibition was changed (2016). The information had not needed to be relearned. Its expression had been masked.
Development creates another kind of lock. A critical period is a stage of life when the brain can reorganize a particular function unusually easily. As the brain matures, structures called perineuronal nets form around some neurons and help stabilize existing connections. They act like biological brakes, reducing the amount of change that is allowed. In animal research, altering these brakes can reopen forms of plasticity that had become much harder to access in adulthood [36][37].
Silent synapses, inhibition, and critical periods are different biological mechanisms, but they share one important pattern. The limitation does not always come from missing hardware. Sometimes the hardware is present and the system itself controls whether it can be used.
6. Practice Can Change What Becomes Available
Meditation becomes especially interesting at this point because it repeatedly asks consciousness to enter territory that was previously automatic. A beginner may notice only that breathing is happening. With practice, the same person may begin noticing the exact point where the inhale changes direction, small movements in the chest and abdomen, heartbeat, warmth, pressure, tension, or an urge to breathe before any deliberate movement occurs.
The body was producing those signals before the person learned to notice them. Practice changed how much of the body's activity entered conscious awareness and how steadily attention could remain there.
Researchers sometimes describe part of this process through sensory gating. Sensory gating is the nervous system's way of turning some incoming signals up and others down so consciousness is not overwhelmed. Alpha rhythms are repeating patterns of brain activity that help regulate this filtering. Mindfulness practice has been associated with changes in how people use these rhythms while directing attention toward bodily sensation [38].
Meditation can also change familiar abilities. Open-monitoring meditation, in which a person notices whatever thoughts, sensations, or experiences arise without holding attention on one narrow object, has been found to improve divergent thinking, the ability to produce many possible answers to a problem [39]. Mindfulness has also improved insight problem solving, where the solution appears after a person stops being trapped inside an unhelpful way of looking at the problem [40].
Advanced practice shows the same principle at a larger scale. Jhāna is a form of deep meditative absorption in which attention becomes unusually stable and ordinary mental activity can recede. Intensive brain imaging of a highly experienced practitioner found distinct changes in how existing brain networks communicated as different jhāna states were entered [41]. A brain network is simply a group of regions whose activity works together. The practitioner did not grow new regions while moving between states; existing regions changed their relationship to one another.
Meditation has also been associated with short-term changes in gene expression in blood cells [42]. Gene expression means how actively a cell is using instructions already contained in its DNA. The DNA did not suddenly acquire a new set of instructions. The same biological library was being read differently.
This is why these findings belong in the same paper. From attention to autonomic regulation, from neural networks to gene use, state and training can change what existing biology is doing without changing the organism into something anatomically new.
7. The Phase-Change Model Returns
The Cosmic Game Theory introduced another part of this argument: development does not always become visible one small step at a time. A system can change gradually underneath while appearing mostly the same from the outside, then cross a threshold and reorganize into a new state. Symbols in Stone carried that idea forward by asking whether Ancient Egyptian practices and environments could have contributed repeated small changes toward a larger transformation.
This paper does not need to rebuild that argument from the beginning, but it matters here because many of the capacities described above are controlled by thresholds, gates, and stable states.
The same pattern appears in many places:
Water cools gradually until its molecules reorganize into ice.
Electrons move between allowed energy states rather than resting permanently at every imaginable energy in between.
Quantum tunneling allows microscopic systems to cross barriers that classical motion would not cross in the ordinary way [43].
Ecosystems can absorb slow change until a tipping point produces a new stable regime [44].
Artificial neural networks can train for a long time before suddenly generalizing what they learned, a phenomenon called grokking [45].
Infant growth has been measured in spurts separated by periods of little measurable increase in length [46].
Cellular reprogramming can move a mature cell into a different stable identity by changing which existing genetic instructions control the cell [47].
Cell-fate decisions can build gradually until a cell commits to one developmental path.
Silent synapses can remain functionally quiet and then become active when the needed conditions are reached [34].
Dormant learned associations can become visible again when inhibition changes [35].
Closed developmental windows can become more plastic again when biological brakes are altered [36][37].
Waking, sleep, anesthesia, and other states of consciousness correspond to different large-scale patterns of brain activity, and transitions between them can happen quickly [48].
The mechanisms are different, but the lesson is the same. A sudden change in what a system can do does not mean the preparation was sudden. The final shift may simply be the moment enough conditions came together for another state to become stable.
That is especially important after everything this paper has already established. If access itself can change, if some biological functions are gated, if some connections can remain silent, if existing tissue can be recruited differently, and if training can change the way whole systems coordinate, then a larger change in access does not have to appear gradually from the inside. It could feel like something opened.
8. Unlocking Access
We can now return to the question left by Symbols in Stone. Ancient Egypt preserved a model in which a person could move from ordinary existence through restoration, order, becoming, and finally into a transformed condition represented by the akh. Modern biology cannot tell us that the Egyptians understood the mechanisms described in this paper. What it can show is that the basic idea of one human organism becoming capable of more than it could access before is not foreign to biology at all.
We experience small versions of it constantly. Stress can make working memory and flexible thinking less available, while reduced stress allows them to return. Positive emotional states can broaden attention and increase creative problem solving. Sleep can reveal relationships within information that was already learned. More coordinated breathing and cardiovascular regulation can change the conditions in which attention and self-control operate. In each case, the person becomes able to use more effectively something the body already possessed.
The same principle then continues beyond abilities we usually think of as mental. The nervous system detects information that never becomes an obvious sensation. Human senses operate with precision ordinary awareness barely notices. Existing brain tissue can be recruited for functions that its everyday role would never predict. Processes called automatic can become more influenceable through training. Some neural connections are physically present but silent. Other information can be masked by inhibition. Developmental capacities can be restricted behind biological brakes and later become more accessible again.
The proposal developed here is that enlightenment may be the far end of this same continuum.
Instead of imagining enlightenment as the body somehow creating a completely new kind of machinery, the theory asks whether consciousness could progressively gain access to more of what human biology already contains. Early stages of that process would look familiar: clearer attention, greater creativity, easier insight, less interference from stress, stronger interoceptive awareness, better emotional regulation, and more coordinated internal states. As development continued, the same principle could extend into parts of the organism that ordinary consciousness does not normally experience directly, including filtered sensory information, autonomic regulation, silent or weak neural pathways, unfamiliar uses of existing brain tissue, and forms of coordination among systems that are rarely available together.
A brief awakening experience could represent temporary access to a biological configuration that the person cannot yet sustain. Continued healing, practice, learning, and biological adaptation could make that configuration easier to enter until what once felt extraordinary became stable. The phase-change model introduced in The Cosmic Game Theory explains why such a transition could feel sudden even if its preparation took years: many smaller changes can accumulate without changing the overall state until one final condition allows the system to reorganize.
Seen this way, the extraordinary possibility grows directly out of an ordinary fact. Human beings already move through life with changing access to their own capacities. We already know that internal state can reveal or suppress abilities that belong to the same body. We already know that the body processes information consciousness does not notice, that training can expand what becomes consciously influenceable, and that some biological capacity is literally held behind functional locks.
The paper ultimately asks how far that pattern can go.
Perhaps enlightenment is not the moment the human body finally receives the hardware for a higher state of consciousness. Perhaps it is the process by which consciousness becomes able to use more and more of the hardware that was already there.
Sources
[1] Shields, G. S., Sazma, M. A., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2016). The effects of acute stress on core executive functions: A meta-analysis and comparison with cortisol. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 68, 651-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.038
[2] Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition & Emotion, 19(3), 313-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930441000238
[3] Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122-1131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1122
[4] Wagner, U., Gais, S., Haider, H., Verleger, R., & Born, J. (2004). Sleep inspires insight. Nature, 427, 352-355. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02223
[5] Richards, J. M., & Gross, J. J. (2000). Emotion regulation and memory: The cognitive costs of keeping one's cool. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 410-424. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.410
[6] Lehrer, P. M., & Gevirtz, R. (2014). Heart rate variability biofeedback: How and why does it work? Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 756. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00756
[7] Magnon, V., Vallet, G. T., Benson, A., et al. (2022). Does heart rate variability predict better executive functioning? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cortex, 155, 218-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2022.07.008
[8] Tinello, D., Kliegel, M., & Zuber, S. (2022). Does heart rate variability biofeedback enhance executive functions across the lifespan? A systematic review. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 6, 126-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-021-00218-3
[9] Wang, C. X., Hilburn, I. A., Wu, D.-A., et al. (2019). Transduction of the geomagnetic field as evidenced from alpha-band activity in the human brain. eNeuro, 6(2), ENEURO.0483-18.2019. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0483-18.2019
[10] Wu, Y., Chen, K., Ye, Y., Zhang, T., & Zhou, W. (2020). Humans navigate with stereo olfaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(27), 16065-16071. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2004642117
[11] Norman, L. J., Hartley, T., & Thaler, L. (2024). Changes in primary visual and auditory cortex of blind and sighted adults following 10 weeks of click-based echolocation training. Cerebral Cortex, 34(6), bhae239. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhae239
[12] Lubner, R. J., Kondamuri, N. S., Knoll, R. M., et al. (2020). Review of audiovestibular symptoms following exposure to acoustic and electromagnetic energy outside conventional human hearing. Frontiers in Neurology, 11, 234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00234
[13] Wong, Y. K., Cheung, L. Y. T., Ngan, V. S. H., & Wong, A. C.-N. (2025). Learning fast and accurate absolute pitch judgment in adulthood. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 32(4), 1676-1688. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-024-02620-2
[14] Brughera, A., Dunai, L., & Hartmann, W. M. (2013). Human interaural time difference thresholds for sine tones: The high-frequency limit. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(5), 2839-2855. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4795778
[15] Lithfous, S., Despres, O., Pebayle, T., Casadio, C., & Dufour, A. (2020). Accurate determination of the cold detection threshold with high-speed cooling of the skin. Pain Medicine, 21(12), 3428-3436. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaa246
[16] Chapman, C. E., et al. (2005). Perception of local DC and AC electric fields in humans. Bioelectromagnetics, 26(5), 357-366. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20109
[17] Tinsley, J. N., Molodtsov, M. I., Prevedel, R., et al. (2016). Direct detection of a single photon by humans. Nature Communications, 7, 12172. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12172
[18] Griswold, M. S., & Stark, W. S. (1992). Scotopic spectral sensitivity of phakic and aphakic observers extending into the near ultraviolet. Vision Research, 32(9), 1739-1743. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(92)90166-G
[19] Palczewska, G., Vinberg, F., Stremplewski, P., et al. (2014). Human infrared vision is triggered by two-photon chromophore isomerization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(50), E5445-E5454. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1410162111
[20] Temple, S. E., McGregor, J. E., Miles, C., et al. (2015). Human perception of visual stimuli modulated by direction of linear polarization. Vision Research, 117, 55-62. PMID: 26291073.
[21] Misson, G. P., et al. (2022). Haidinger's brushes: Psychophysical analysis of an entoptic phenomenon. PMID: 35709591.
[22] Poggio, T., Fahle, M., & Edelman, S. (1992). Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity. Science, 256(5059), 1018-1021. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1589770
[23] Jordan, G., Deeb, S. S., Bosten, J. M., & Mollon, J. D. (2010). The dimensionality of color vision in carriers of anomalous trichromacy. Journal of Vision, 10(8), 12. https://doi.org/10.1167/10.8.12
[24] Doty, R. L. (2006). Olfactory dysfunction and its measurement in the clinic and workplace. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 79, 268-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-005-0055-6
[25] Porter, J., Craven, B., Khan, R. M., et al. (2007). Mechanisms of scent-tracking in humans. Nature Neuroscience, 10(1), 27-29. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1819
[26] Calvi, E., Quassolo, U., Massaia, M., Scandurra, A., D'Aniello, B., & D'Amelio, P. (2020). The scent of emotions: A systematic review of human intra- and interspecific chemical communication of emotions. Brain and Behavior, 10(5), e01585. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1585
[27] Craig, A. D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 655-666. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn894
[28] Reich, L., Maidenbaum, S., & Amedi, A. (2012). Reading with sounds: Sensory substitution selectively activates the visual word form area in the blind. Neuron, 76(3), 640-652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.026
[29] Maidenbaum, S., Abboud, S., & Amedi, A. (2014). Sensory substitution: Closing the gap between basic research and widespread practical visual rehabilitation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 41, 3-15.
[30] Meissner, S. N., Bachinger, M., Kikkert, S., et al. (2024). Self-regulating arousal via pupil-based biofeedback. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(1), 43-62. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01729-z
[31] Heathers, J. A. J., Fayn, K., Silvia, P. J., Tiliopoulos, N., & Goodwin, M. S. (2018). The voluntary control of piloerection. PeerJ, 6, e5292. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5292
[32] Kozhevnikov, M., Elliott, J., Shephard, J., & Gramann, K. (2013). Neurocognitive and somatic components of temperature increases during g-Tummo meditation: Legend and reality. PLOS ONE, 8(3), e58244. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058244
[33] Kox, M., van Eijk, L. T., Zwaag, J., et al. (2014). Voluntary activation of the sympathetic nervous system and attenuation of the innate immune response in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(20), 7379-7384. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322174111
[34] Vardalaki, D., Yaeger, C. E., & Harnett, M. T. (2025). Silent synapses in the adult brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 48, 169-189. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-112723-032924
[35] Barron, H. C., Vogels, T. P., Emir, U. E., et al. (2016). Unmasking latent inhibitory connections in human cortex to reveal dormant cortical memories. Neuron, 90(1), 191-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.02.031
[36] Carulli, D., & Verhaagen, J. (2021). An extracellular perspective on CNS maturation: Perineuronal nets and the control of plasticity. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(5), 2434. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052434
[37] Nardou, R., Sawyer, E., Song, Y. J., et al. (2023). Psychedelics reopen the social reward learning critical period. Nature, 618, 790-798. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06204-3
[38] Kerr, C. E., Sacchet, M. D., Lazar, S. W., Moore, C. I., & Jones, S. R. (2013). Mindfulness starts with the body: Somatosensory attention and top-down modulation of cortical alpha rhythms in mindfulness meditation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00012
[39] Colzato, L. S., Ozturk, A., & Hommel, B. (2012). Meditate to create: The impact of focused-attention and open-monitoring training on convergent and divergent thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00116
[40] Ostafin, B. D., & Kassman, K. T. (2012). Stepping out of history: Mindfulness improves insight problem solving. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(2), 1031-1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.02.014
[41] Chowdhury, A., et al. (2025). Multimodal neurophenomenology of advanced concentration absorption meditation: An intensively sampled case study of Jhana. NeuroImage, 305, 120973.
[42] Kaliman, P., Alvarez-Lopez, M. J., Cosin-Tomas, M., Rosenkranz, M. A., Lutz, A., & Davidson, R. J. (2014). Rapid changes in histone deacetylases and inflammatory gene expression in expert meditators. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 40, 96-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.11.004
[43] Hensinger, W. K., Haffner, H., Browaeys, A., et al. (2001). Dynamical tunnelling of ultracold atoms. Nature, 412, 52-55. https://doi.org/10.1038/35083510
[44] Scheffer, M., Bascompte, J., Brock, W. A., et al. (2009). Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature, 461, 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08227
[45] Power, A., Burda, Y., Edwards, H., Babuschkin, I., & Misra, V. (2022). Grokking: Generalization beyond overfitting on small algorithmic datasets. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.02177
[46] Lampl, M., Veldhuis, J. D., & Johnson, M. L. (1992). Saltation and stasis: A model of human growth. Science, 258(5083), 801-803. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1439787
[47] Ladewig, J., Koch, P., & Brustle, O. (2013). Leveling Waddington: The emergence of direct programming and the loss of cell fate hierarchies. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 14, 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3543
[48] Gervais, C., Boucher, L.-P., Martinez Villar, G., Lee, U., & Duclos, C. (2023). A scoping review for building a criticality-based conceptual framework of altered states of consciousness. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 17, 1085902. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2023.1085902
Comments