The Purpose Of Creation: The Co-Evolution Of Creativity And Personal Coherence

A group of dots on a page can look random until lines are drawn between them. Once several dots connect, a shape appears, and that shape changes the meaning of every dot around it. Nothing new had to be added to the page. What changed was the relationship among pieces that were already there.

A life can change in the same way. A childhood experience, a repeated fear, a favorite subject, a skill, a relationship, and an idea may seem unrelated while each is viewed alone. Years later, one change can make several of them suddenly belong to the same pattern. A person heals a fear and recognizes why they kept making the same choice. That recognition connects with something they have studied for years. The connection becomes an explanation, a method, a piece of art, a different way of relating, or some other creation. The individual events have not changed, yet their meaning has changed because they can now be understood together.

Earlier papers in this series established several parts of that movement. Unlocking Access showed that the same person can have different access to existing capacities depending on how the system is organized. The Physiology of Expenditure showed that protection requires ongoing work and that healing can reduce work that is no longer needed. Borrowed States showed how qualities that once depended on an outside route can become increasingly natural as the person changes. Those papers were concerned with access, expenditure, and embodiment. They leave a different question open: what happens when more of a person's experience and capacity can begin working together?

That question leads to personal coherence. Coherence means that separate parts fit together well enough to function as a whole. Personal coherence is the growing fit among what a person has experienced, what they feel, what they understand, what they value, and how they act. It does not require a perfectly orderly life. It means that fewer parts of the person have to remain disconnected or work against one another because of old fear, shame, or protection. When an experience can be understood instead of merely reacted to, it becomes available for use. When several experiences can be understood together, they can become the material for something new.

This is where creativity enters the argument. Creativity is the ability to combine what is already available into a form that did not exist before and that has some meaning or use. The result can be a painting or invention, but it can also be an explanation, a relationship, a teaching method, a family pattern, a theory, a solution, or a different way of living. Creativity gives relationships among experiences a form. Once that form exists, the person can examine it, learn from it, and change again. The rest of this paper follows that process far enough to ask whether creativity does more than express who a person already is. It may also help organize who the person is becoming.

Creativity Begins With What Is Already There

A new idea rarely begins with completely new material. A person solves a problem by using things they have seen, learned, remembered, or tried before, even when the final answer looks unlike any one of those pieces. A sentence works the same way. The words may all be familiar, but a new arrangement can express a thought that has never been written in exactly that form. Creative thought depends partly on having material available and partly on being able to bring the right pieces into contact.

Unlocking Access already established that having a capacity is not the same as being able to use it in every state. The question here is narrower: if more of our past experience becomes available, does the mind have more material to combine in new ways? In a 2015 experiment, Kevin Madore, Donna Rose Addis, and Daniel Schacter first guided people to recall the specific details of a recent experience, then asked them to imagine unusual but workable uses for common objects. This kind of task measures divergent thinking, meaning producing many possible answers instead of searching for one correct answer. After detailed recall, participants generated ideas from about six more categories than they did after the comparison exercise (34.48 vs. 28.57), and a second experiment found the same pattern (26.57 vs. 23.09). [1] They had not learned anything new about the objects. More of their existing experience had simply been brought into reach before they tried to create something new.

A 2026 meta-analysis of 21 samples from 16 experiments found the same general pattern: detailed-memory exercises produced small increases in the number and variety of appropriate ideas, though they did not consistently make those ideas more original or more fully developed. The effect became weaker or disappeared after corrections for publication bias, meaning that studies finding no effect may be underrepresented in the published literature. [2] The result is useful precisely because it is limited. Access to more experience seems to widen the pool of pieces available for combination; it does not by itself create an exceptional idea.

Creativity therefore depends on more than memory, but memory helps supply the pieces. The more experience that can be reached and compared, the more possible relationships the mind has available to discover.

Healing Changes What Experience Can Mean

An experience can leave behind more than a memory of what happened. It can also leave a rule about what similar situations mean. A person who was repeatedly punished for disagreement may later feel danger during an ordinary difference of opinion. Someone who was ignored may hear rejection in an uncertain reply. The present event arrives together with an older expectation, so the person reacts to both at once.

Unlocking Access already established that protective states can narrow working memory and cognitive flexibility, the abilities used to hold several pieces in mind and shift among possibilities. Their importance here is that creative thought depends on the same ability to hold and rearrange pieces. Healing adds a different source of information: when an old protective pattern resolves, the contrast between before and after can reveal how earlier experiences had been organized.

Healing changes the problem from another side. As the term is used in this series, healing means that an old protective response no longer has to organize the present in the same way because the fear, belief, or need beneath it has changed. The memory can remain while the old meaning loses its control. That difference creates information that did not exist before the change was lived.

Suppose a person used to feel ashamed whenever someone disagreed with them. After that shame resolves, another disagreement occurs and the old reaction does not appear. The words from the other person may be almost the same, but the inner result is different. Comparing the two states reveals that the disagreement itself was never the whole cause of the shame. Something inside the person had been adding meaning to the event.

That contrast can reorganize years of experience. The same person may realize that fear of disagreement had also shaped perfectionism, people-pleasing, avoidance of mistakes, or the need to explain themselves constantly. Events that once required separate explanations begin to connect. The person does not simply feel better; they understand more. The change has turned experience into information about how their own mind had been organized.

This is one way personal coherence can grow. A collection of reactions that once seemed unrelated can become one understandable pattern. Once the pattern is visible, it can be expressed. The person can explain it, teach it, write about it, build a method around it, change how they relate to others, or notice the same structure somewhere else. Healing therefore does not only remove interference. It can reveal relationships among experiences that later become material for creation.

Attention Determines What Accumulates

A person cannot notice everything at once. In any ordinary day there are more sounds, faces, thoughts, memories, sensations, and details than attention can hold together. What repeatedly receives attention therefore matters because the subjects a person returns to gradually collect more detail, more memory, and more possible connections.

Mindfulness offers a direct test of whether changing attention can change creativity. Mindfulness means deliberately noticing present experience with less immediate judgment or automatic reaction. A 2023 meta-analysis of 20 controlled experiments found a small-to-moderate improvement in creative performance after mindfulness interventions (d = 0.42). [3] The participants did not gain years of new knowledge before the creative tasks. Changing how attention was organized changed what they could do with material they already possessed.

Attention also follows interest. Psychologists use the term intrinsic motivation for doing something because the activity itself is interesting or satisfying. A large 2016 meta-analysis found a moderate positive relationship between intrinsic motivation and creativity across 68 samples involving 19,695 people (corrected correlation = 0.34). Intrinsic motivation also remained a positive predictor of creativity when the researchers considered other motivational factors at the same time. [4] Interest therefore does more than make creative work pleasant. It keeps attention returning to the same material long enough for knowledge, skill, failures, questions, and possible connections to accumulate.

Why the Reason for Doing Something Matters

Two people can spend the same day doing the same work for very different reasons. One may care about the work itself, while the other may experience it mainly as the requirement attached to a paycheck. The difference is obvious; what matters here is what research shows happens when those motives organize large parts of a person's life.

Self-determination theory, a psychological framework for understanding motivation, distinguishes autonomous motivation from controlled motivation. Autonomous motivation means doing something because it is interesting or because the person genuinely values it. Controlled motivation means doing it mainly because of reward, pressure, obligation, guilt, or fear. A salary does not make work controlled by itself; the question is whether the work has value to the person beyond the reward attached to it.

A 2026 meta-analysis brought together 192 workplace studies involving 93,552 people and found a clear divide. Motivation that felt personally chosen or meaningful was consistently linked with better engagement, satisfaction, and psychological well-being. The strongest pattern appeared when people did work because they personally considered it important, even when every task was not enjoyable (job satisfaction beta = 0.77; well-being beta = 0.70). By contrast, working mainly for outside reward or pressure had essentially no relationship with job satisfaction or well-being (beta = 0.00 and -0.02), only a small relationship with performance (beta = 0.13), and a moderate relationship with greater burnout (beta = 0.33). [5]

The result matters because externally driven work can still produce output without producing the same quality of inner life. A person can perform adequately while spending much of the day in an activity that contributes little to satisfaction or well-being. When the activity itself is valued, the same hours can build skill while also supporting the person who is living them.

The match between a person's interests and their work shows the same pattern from another angle. Across 105 studies involving 39,602 people, better interest fit had a small but consistent relationship with greater job satisfaction (corrected correlation = 0.19), and the relationship was stronger when people judged their broader career choice rather than one narrow feature of a job. [6] The effect is modest, but it answers a different question: people tend to be more satisfied when the work shaping their lives fits what they naturally prefer.

Interest therefore matters twice in this theory. It directs attention toward the material from which creativity develops, and it affects how it feels to live the years in which that development occurs.

When Interest Becomes Passion

An interest becomes more powerful when it keeps surviving competition from everything else that could receive attention. A person may enjoy hundreds of things briefly, yet return to only a few of them for years. Those repeated returns can eventually make the activity part of how the person understands themselves.

Psychologist Robert Vallerand and his colleagues use the word passion for a strong inclination toward an activity that a person likes, considers important, and repeatedly invests time and energy in. Their research distinguishes harmonious passion from obsessive passion. Harmonious passion remains freely chosen and fits alongside the rest of the person's life. Obsessive passion contains an inner pressure that makes the person feel driven to continue even when the activity conflicts with other parts of life. [7]

That distinction matters for happiness and mental health. In the first study, 782 people with harmonious passion scored higher than both obsessively passionate and non-passionate people on measures of growth and meaning and on happiness and life satisfaction. Their scores were about 7-10% higher relative to the comparison-group averages (5.85 vs. 5.45 and 5.48; 5.37 vs. 4.98 and 4.89 on seven-point scales). [8] The same form of passion that sustained long-term involvement was also associated with greater well-being.

The more revealing result appeared over time. In the second study, vitality - the felt sense of being alive, energetic, and available for life - increased in the harmonious-passion group (+0.33) but significantly declined in both the obsessive-passion group (-0.07) and the group without a passion (-0.34); those latter two groups did not significantly differ from each other. [8] The absence of passion was therefore not neutral: the no-passion group showed the largest decline. At the same time, simply having a passion was not enough. What mattered was whether the passion remained harmonious rather than becoming controlling.

A much larger 2020 meta-analysis of 106 samples and 38,481 people reinforced the same pattern. Harmonious work passion had a very strong relationship with job satisfaction (corrected correlation = 0.72), a strong relationship with lower burnout (-0.61), and a moderate relationship with creativity (0.35). [9] Passion is therefore linked not only with how long a person stays engaged, but with both the quality of the life built around that engagement and what the person becomes able to create from it.

Passion also changes the depth of the material available for creative thought. Someone who returns to the same subject for years notices finer differences, encounters more failures and exceptions, and builds a denser network of memories around it. Repeated attention turns familiarity into depth.

How Passion Becomes Expertise

Depth becomes expertise when years of interest are turned into increasingly refined skill. Expertise means unusually developed knowledge or performance within a particular field. It is not the same as simply spending a long time around an activity, because improvement depends on what happens during those years. Deliberate practice means working specifically on something a person cannot yet do well, paying close attention to errors, using feedback, and repeating the difficult part until performance changes. It is practice designed to improve weakness rather than practice designed only to repeat what is already comfortable.

Passion matters because deliberate practice is demanding. In one study, harmonious passion moderately predicted more deliberate practice (beta = 0.32). In a second study, it more strongly predicted mastery goals - the desire to improve at the activity itself (beta = 0.46) - which then predicted more deliberate practice. Deliberate practice, in turn, predicted better performance (beta = 0.21-0.28). [10] The point is not that passion makes every hour enjoyable. It gives a person a reason to keep returning to the difficult parts long enough for performance to change.

This provides the bridge between loving a subject and becoming unusually capable within it. Passion keeps the person returning, deliberate practice changes what they can do, and years of that cycle can reorganize both knowledge and skill around the subject.

Research on expert performance shows how large that accumulation can become. In a classic study of musicians, the best violinists had accumulated thousands more hours of individual practice by age eighteen than the comparison groups (about 7,410 hours vs. 5,301 and 3,420). Expert pianists showed an even larger difference from amateurs (about 7,606 hours vs. 1,606). [11] The scale of those differences shows how much repeated practice can accumulate by the time expertise becomes visible.

This research later became famous through the idea of a '10,000-hour rule,' but 10,000 hours is not a universal finish line. Different fields develop on very different timelines, with elite performers reaching their highest levels across a broad range of years and accumulated domain-specific activity (roughly five to thirty years and about 3,000 to 40,000 hours). [12] The useful lesson is the scale of sustained involvement, not a magic number. Placed beside the passion research, the connection becomes clearer: practice explains how capacity is built, while passion helps explain why someone would keep returning long enough for that scale of development to occur.

This offers a developmental way to understand what people often call genius. Genius, as the word is used here, means exceptional ability to understand, create, or perform within a field. The useful question is not whether someone was born already able to produce extraordinary work, but how a mind becomes capable of seeing and producing things that most people cannot. Sustained curiosity keeps attention returning, passion makes that return personally meaningful, deliberate practice turns difficulty into skill, and years of expertise give the mind an increasingly rich structure from which unusual connections can emerge. What looks sudden at the moment of discovery may be the visible result of development that has been occurring for years.

Albert Einstein expressed the same idea more simply in a 1952 letter to Carl Seelig: 'I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious.' [13] The value of the line is not that curiosity alone guarantees genius. It captures the engine that keeps development moving long enough for exceptional thought to become possible.

When Connections Begin to Multiply

Once passion has gathered enough material, a new connection can do more than solve one problem. It can become part of the structure for solving another. A child who learns that two smaller numbers can be combined to make a larger one can use that relationship again in a harder problem. The first understanding becomes a tool for the second. Creative development can build in the same way.

Brain research supports the idea that creativity depends on cooperation among different kinds of mental work rather than one single creativity center. Beaty, Seli, and Schacter describe creative thinking as involving interaction between the default network, which helps internally generated ideas and memories arise, and the executive-control network, which helps direct, evaluate, and shape them. [14] In plain language, creativity needs both possibilities and the ability to work with them.

The same structure appears in personal development. Integration means bringing separate pieces into relationship so they can function as part of a larger whole. A person notices that several different conflicts produced the same feeling, connects that feeling with an earlier experience, and recognizes a common pattern. Once the relationship is understood, it becomes available for the next experience rather than having to be discovered from the beginning.

This paper calls that accumulating process the Creative Expansion Principle. A meaningful connection does not disappear after producing one insight; it becomes part of the structure from which later insights can form. Each useful integration gives future experience more places to connect, so creative development can accelerate as the network of relationships grows.

The pattern resembles the phase-change model already established in Unlocking Access. Years of learning, healing, passionate attention, deliberate practice, and smaller discoveries may produce little obvious change from the outside. Then enough pieces connect that ideas begin arriving in clusters. The visible burst is sudden even though the structure that made it possible was built slowly.

When Desire Stops Doing a Psychological Job

Passion can organize a life, but intensity by itself does not reveal where the intensity comes from. A person can return to the same activity because it expresses something they deeply value, or because succeeding at it has become the way they obtain worth, safety, approval, or belonging.

Borrowed States introduced compensatory desire: a person may believe they want a substance while the deeper pull is toward the state the substance temporarily provides. The same structure can appear in ordinary goals. Recognition can temporarily create worth. Constant usefulness can protect against abandonment. Achievement can hold shame at a distance. When an activity is carrying one of those psychological jobs, the person may feel powerfully driven toward it even when the activity itself is not the deepest source of the attraction.

The distinction between harmonious and obsessive passion describes a similar difference from another angle. Harmonious passion remains chosen because the activity itself matters. Obsessive passion contains pressure because some part of identity or emotional security has become attached to continuing. [7] Healing can therefore change the meaning of the same outward behavior by changing what the behavior is being asked to provide.

If the need for recognition weakens and the person loses interest in being seen, recognition was doing an emotional job. If the need for recognition weakens but the person remains deeply drawn to communicate, teach, build, understand, or create, the interest has survived the loss of the compensation. The activity no longer has to prove that the person is worthy, yet the person still wants to do it.

This is why healing matters to the search for purpose. As worth, safety, connection, and emotional stability become less dependent on achievement or approval, the person can see more clearly which interests remain when they are no longer needed as protection. Those remaining passions carry different information because they have become less mixed with the need to repair something outside themselves.

Purpose Becomes Visible as a Pattern

Imagine someone who spends years doing very different things: helping a friend understand a conflict, writing about behavior, teaching a child how to name a feeling, and building a tool that makes learning easier. Each activity has its own immediate goal. Viewed together, however, they may keep returning to the same deeper concern: making confusing experience understandable.

That recurring concern is more informative than any one occupation. Writing may be one expression, teaching another, and designing a method a third. The forms can change while the underlying pattern becomes easier to recognize. Purpose, as the term is used here, is that deeper recurring pattern through which a person is drawn to understand, develop, and contribute something. It is not limited to a job title or one permanent project.

Psychologist and creativity researcher James C. Kaufman has studied how creativity contributes to the way people make meaning from their lives. He describes creativity as one way people can connect the past, present, and future rather than experiencing them as separate pieces of time. [15]

The past gives a person experiences to work with, but having an experience does not automatically mean understanding it. When someone writes about an event, paints it, explains it to another person, develops an idea from it, or turns what they learned into something useful, they have to decide what parts of the experience matter and how those parts fit together. In that process, creativity can change the meaning of what happened without changing the event itself. The experience becomes part of a larger understanding rather than remaining an isolated memory.

The same process can organize the present because what a person chooses to create reflects what they notice, care about, question, and understand. Creating gives internal experience an external form. Something that existed only as a feeling, interest, memory, or half-formed idea can become words, images, explanations, methods, relationships, or solutions that the person can examine more clearly. Creation can therefore make patterns visible that were difficult to recognize while the pieces remained separate.

Creativity also reaches forward because every creation involves forming something that does not yet exist in its finished form. Before a person can write a new explanation, build a new system, solve a problem differently, or create a different kind of life, they must be able to imagine a possibility beyond what already exists. Experience provides material from the past, creation organizes that material in the present, and the resulting understanding makes new possibilities imaginable for the future. [15]

Healing can make the larger pattern easier to see because it separates enduring interest from compensatory pressure. Passion keeps attention returning to particular subjects. Creativity gives those subjects repeated forms. Over time, a person can look across those forms and recognize that the same concern has been developing through projects that once seemed unrelated.

Purpose is therefore both discovered and developed. It is discovered because the recurring pattern can be present before the person consciously names it. It is developed because every act of creation changes what the person knows, what they can do, and what becomes possible next. The past supplies a pattern without deciding every future form.

Creation Changes the Creator

A person who writes an explanation often sees something on the page that was difficult to notice while the idea remained only in thought. Someone who builds a method discovers where it fails. Someone who teaches a concept hears a question they have never answered. The finished creation returns information to the person who made it.

That return is what makes the relationship reciprocal. Personal coherence helps creation because more of the person's experience can work together. Creation helps personal coherence because the thing created exposes new relationships, contradictions, and possibilities that can be brought back into the self. The term co-evolution describes two processes that develop through this continuing influence on one another. Creativity and personal coherence co-evolve because each changes the conditions under which the other develops.

What the Pattern Suggests About Intention

Once this process is viewed across years instead of moments, another question appears. A painful experience may later become understandable through healing. The insight gained from healing may connect with a subject the person has cared about since childhood. Years of passion may have quietly supplied the knowledge needed to recognize the connection, and an earlier creation may provide the exact form needed to express what the newer insight revealed. From inside the life, the pieces can seem to have been gathering long before their eventual relationship was visible.

The Creation of Purpose interprets repeated convergence of this kind as developmental intentionality. Intentionality means that something has an organizing direction rather than being only a collection of unrelated events. Developmental intentionality therefore means that the growth of an individual consciousness has a pattern and that experiences can participate in preparing the person for what they later become able to understand and create.

An ordinary cause and a developmental role can exist at the same time. A meeting can occur because two people happened to be in the same place and still become central to what one of them learns. An illness can have a biological cause and later become part of the knowledge through which someone helps others. The immediate event explains how something happened; the larger pattern concerns what the experience became part of.

Seen across enough connections, life begins to resemble a curriculum. A curriculum is an ordered process through which one experience prepares a learner for what can be understood next. In this model, experience supplies material, healing reveals relationships within that material, interest repeatedly draws attention toward particular subjects, passion sustains that attention long enough for depth to develop, creativity gives the relationships form, and each new creation becomes another experience from which development continues. Purpose is the recurring structure that becomes visible across the process.

Creation Beyond the Individual

A creation does not remain only inside the person who made it. An explanation changes what another person can understand. A method can be improved by its next user. A family can create a different pattern that children then carry into their own relationships. A discovery can become the starting point for work its creator could not have imagined. Once something is created, it becomes part of the world from which other people develop.

This widens creativity beyond art and invention. A person can create a healthier relationship, a fairer system, a clearer explanation, a new ritual, a different family culture, or a way of responding that interrupts an inherited pattern. The scale does not determine whether something is creative. What matters is that experience has been reorganized into a form that changes what becomes possible afterward.

Every person begins from a different combination of experiences, relationships, abilities, wounds, interests, and discoveries. Because the available pieces differ, the combinations that can emerge also differ. Individuality therefore gives consciousness multiple positions from which reality can be understood and changed.

A larger spiritual possibility follows from that pattern. If consciousness can experience the world, become changed by what it experiences, understand some of that change, and create something that alters what happens next, then creation may be part of the developmental function of consciousness itself. Reality is not only something conscious beings observe. Their choices, explanations, relationships, methods, and inventions become part of the conditions that future consciousness encounters.

The Co-Evolution of Creativity and Personal Coherence

The argument can now be stated without retracing every study. Healing can reduce the fear, worth, approval, and protection that once organized a person's choices. As those pressures weaken, it becomes easier to distinguish what had to be pursued from what the person still feels drawn toward when nothing has to be proved.

What remains often has the character of passion. It keeps attention returning to particular subjects, supports the long development of knowledge and skill, and - when it is harmonious rather than compulsive - can make the life built around that development more satisfying rather than more depleted. Passion therefore does not sit beside creativity as a separate trait. It helps create the depth from which creativity draws.

Creativity then carries that developing coherence outward. An insight becomes an explanation, an explanation becomes a method, a method creates a new experience, and that experience returns new information to the person. Greater coherence expands what can be created because more of the person's experience can work together; creation deepens coherence because what is created reveals relationships and possibilities that were difficult to see before. This is the co-evolution named in the subtitle.

Purpose becomes visible inside that cycle as a recurring pattern rather than a single job or project. The form can change while the deeper attraction remains. A person may write, teach, build, study, organize, care for others, or create relationships in very different ways while repeatedly returning to the same underlying kind of problem, question, or contribution.

This is where the scientific pattern opens into the spiritual proposal of the theory. If enduring passions repeatedly guide attention, sustain development, support well-being, fuel creativity, and keep producing related forms of contribution across a life, then passion may be more than a clue that points toward purpose. A person's deepest harmonious passions may be the felt form of purpose before the larger pattern of that purpose can be seen.

A person does not need to know the final shape of their contribution in order to feel drawn toward the material from which it will eventually be made. Passion keeps bringing consciousness back to certain parts of experience. Healing helps separate that pull from the needs that can imitate it. Creativity gives the pull form, and personal coherence makes the recurring pattern easier to recognize.

A life may begin with scattered dots. Experience adds more of them. Passion keeps attention returning to some before the picture can be seen, healing changes how others are understood, and creativity draws connections among them. Purpose is the pattern that gradually becomes visible through the process. If this theory is correct, our deepest passions are not merely signposts on the way to purpose. They may be how purpose is first experienced from the inside.

Sources

1. Madore, K. P., Addis, D. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2015). Creativity and memory: Effects of an episodic-specificity induction on divergent thinking. Psychological Science, 26(9), 1461-1468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615591863

2. Tomás, G., Bajo, T., & Marful, A. (2026). Effect of episodic specificity induction on divergent thinking: A meta-analytic study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 33(5), 151. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-026-02859-x

3. Hughes, Z., Ball, L. J., Richardson, C., & Judge, J. (2023). A meta-analytical review of the impact of mindfulness on creativity: Framing current lines of research and defining moderator variables. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30, 2155-2186. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-023-02327-w

4. Liu, D., Jiang, K., Shalley, C. E., Keem, S., & Zhou, J. (2016). Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137, 236-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.08.001

5. Hagger, M. S., & Star, K. M. (2026). Self-Determination Theory and Workplace Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Stress and Health, 42(1), e70151. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.70151

6. Hoff, K. A., Song, Q. C., Wee, C. J. M., Phan, W. M. J., & Rounds, J. (2020). Interest fit and job satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 123, 103503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103503

7. Vallerand, R. J., Blanchard, C., Mageau, G. A., Koestner, R., Ratelle, C., Léonard, M., Gagné, M., & Marsolais, J. (2003). Les passions de l'âme: On obsessive and harmonious passion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 756-767. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.756

8. Philippe, F. L., Vallerand, R. J., & Lavigne, G. L. (2009). Passion does make a difference in people's lives: A look at well-being in passionate and non-passionate individuals. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 1(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2008.01003.x

9. Pollack, J. M., Ho, V. T., O'Boyle, E. H., & Kirkman, B. L. (2020). Passion at work: A meta-analysis of individual work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(4), 311-331. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2434

10. Vallerand, R. J., Salvy, S.-J., Mageau, G. A., Elliot, A. J., Denis, P. L., Grouzet, F. M. E., & Blanchard, C. (2007). On the role of passion in performance. Journal of Personality, 75(3), 505-534. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00447.x

11. Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363-406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363

12. Ericsson, K. A., & Harwell, K. W. (2019). Deliberate practice and proposed limits on the effects of practice on the acquisition of expert performance: Why the original definition matters and recommendations for future research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2396. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02396

13. Einstein, A. (1952, March 11). Letter to Carl Seelig [Letter]. Albert Einstein Archives, 39-013, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

14. Beaty, R. E., Seli, P., & Schacter, D. L. (2019). Network neuroscience of creative cognition: Mapping cognitive mechanisms and individual differences in the creative brain. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.08.013

15. Kaufman, J. C. (2018). Finding meaning with creativity in the past, present, and future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(6), 734-749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618771981