When The Body Speaks: Decoding The Language Of The Subconscious

Sometimes the body reacts before we understand what we are reacting to. A person thinks about saying something difficult and notices that their throat has tightened. Someone mentions a particular relationship and their chest suddenly feels heavy. A decision seems reasonable on paper, yet their stomach turns when they imagine making it. Another person walks into a room and feels uneasy before consciously noticing the strained voices, unusual silence, or expressions that gave them the feeling.

In each case, the explanation arrives after the reaction has already begun.

The Cosmic Game Theory of Consciousness: The Synthetic Codification of Spirituality's Emergent Scientific Grammar established why that delay matters. Conscious awareness has access to only a tiny portion of the information being processed by the larger nervous system. Recent information-theoretic estimates place the information gathered by human sensory systems on the order of a billion bits per second, while deliberate human behavior operates closer to about ten bits per second [1]. A bit is simply a unit used to count information. The exact comparison depends on what is being measured, but the difference in scale is enormous. The body and nervous system are continuously receiving, comparing, filtering, and responding to far more information than conscious thought could examine individually.

Imagine that conscious awareness could read only one sentence from an enormous book at a time. The rest of the book would not disappear simply because it was not currently being read. Processes outside awareness could still use information from those other pages, and the result might reach consciousness before the information that produced it does.

The body may be one of the places where that happens. A change in breathing, pressure in the chest, tension in the jaw, warmth in the face, heaviness in the stomach, or an unexpected urge to move can become noticeable before the person understands what caused it. The sensation does not necessarily arrive with an explanation. It may simply be the first part of a much larger process to become conscious.

That creates the question this paper follows: if the body can respond to information before the conscious mind understands it, can bodily sensation help reveal what the subconscious already knows?

1. The Body Responds Before the Explanation

Think about an ordinary disagreement. Before either person has finished explaining their position, one person's jaw may already be tight, the other's arms may have folded across their chest, and both may be breathing differently than they were a few minutes earlier. Neither person had to decide to produce those reactions. The body changed as the meaning of the interaction changed.

The same sequence appears outside conflict. A message from someone important can make the chest feel warm before the person has formed a full thought about why it matters. Walking toward a difficult conversation can make the legs restless. Remembering an embarrassing moment can change the face, stomach, or breathing even though the event is no longer happening. The body does not wait for a finished verbal explanation before it begins participating in experience.

This is easier to understand once we stop treating conscious thought as the place where all processing begins. Much of what guides a human being is already happening before deliberate attention arrives. The term subconscious will be used here for processing that influences experience without being fully available to deliberate conscious thought: learned associations, automatic emotional responses, habits, implicit memories, pattern recognition, and other activity that can shape what we feel or do before we can explain it.

The subconscious is therefore not a second person hidden inside the mind. It is a name for the processing that can shape experience before deliberate thought has access to the whole explanation.

2. The Larger System Knows More Than Conscious Thought

If conscious awareness receives only a small portion of what the nervous system is processing, the next question is what happens to everything that never becomes a deliberate thought. That information is not simply discarded. The nervous system can compare what is happening now with earlier experience, recognize familiar patterns, adjust attention, prepare the body to act, and produce emotional or physical responses without first explaining any of those processes in words.

This means that a person can receive the result of processing before they receive the reasoning behind it. A person can enter a room and immediately sense that something is wrong before noticing why. A few seconds later they may identify the pieces: two people are standing farther apart than usual, one is avoiding eye contact, the voices are flatter, and the pauses are longer. Conscious thought receives the conclusion first and reconstructs some of the evidence afterward. What felt like a mysterious impression can be the conscious arrival of processing that began earlier.

The body provides one of the routes through which that hidden processing can enter awareness. Interoception is the nervous system's sensing of conditions inside the body, including heartbeat, breathing, pressure, temperature, tension, pain, hunger, and signals from internal organs. A. D. Craig described interoception as part of the process through which the physiological condition of the body contributes to feeling and awareness [2].

Imagine a smoke alarm. The alarm is not the fire and it does not explain the entire building, but it can make a hidden change impossible to ignore. A tightening chest, sudden heaviness, warmth, nausea, trembling, or pressure may work in a similar way. The sensation can become the first conscious sign that the larger system has already registered something important.

That does not yet tell us what the sensation means. To understand why the body might carry information from the past into the present, we first need to see how experience can become a learned physical response.

3. The Body Is Already a Language Between People

Before asking whether the body can communicate something inwardly, it helps to notice how much communication it already carries between people. Conversation is never made of words alone. A person can say that they are comfortable while their shoulders remain raised, their body turns away, and their voice becomes thin. Another person can say the same words while leaning closer, relaxing their face, and speaking easily. The sentence is identical, but the message is not.

Researchers call this nonverbal communication: information carried through channels other than the literal words themselves. Scientific reviews include the face, voice, body, touch, and the distance people keep from one another, and they study both how those cues are sent and how accurately other people read them [3]. A person does not have to deliberately choose every change in posture or expression, and the observer does not have to consciously list every cue before the overall impression begins to form.

One well-known estimate gives a sense of how much those nonverbal channels can matter when people are trying to read feelings and attitudes. In Albert Mehrabian's experiments, participants judged emotional attitude from words, vocal tone, and facial information that did not always agree. When the findings were combined, the relative contribution to the perceived attitude was summarized as roughly 7 percent from the words, 38 percent from the voice, and 55 percent from visible facial information [4,5]. Those numbers were not a formula for every kind of communication; they came from the much narrower problem of deciding how someone feels when the available signals conflict. That narrower situation is precisely the one that matters here. When we are reading another person's emotional state, most of what shapes the impression can come from information other than the literal words.

The body itself can carry emotional information. Posture and movement help other people recognize emotional states, while information from the body interacts with information from the face and voice. Research on emotional body expressions has also found that some of this processing can occur below conscious awareness [6]. We can therefore be influenced by what another body is communicating before we can explain exactly what we saw.

This makes the body's role in subconscious communication much less unusual than it first appears. One nervous system is already expressing internal conditions through muscle tension, posture, movement, breathing, facial activity, and voice while another nervous system is reading the pattern. Much of the exchange can begin before either person turns it into a deliberate verbal explanation.

Our ordinary language preserves the same connection from the inside. During a breakup someone may say that their heart hurts. A frightening situation can leave a knot in the stomach. Words can get stuck in the throat. Responsibility can feel like weight on the shoulders. People swallow anger, grit their teeth, stand their ground, lose their footing, hold on, let go, and struggle to move forward. Some of these phrases describe sensations people genuinely feel, while others use physical experience as metaphor, but both show how naturally bodily location and bodily function become tied to psychological meaning.

The important point is not that every gesture or phrase proves a fixed body code. It is that the body is already doing two things the theory requires: it can express internal conditions without waiting for a verbal explanation, and human beings already understand experience through the functions and sensations of particular body regions. The next question is how a person's own history shapes what their body learns to express.

4. How Experience Becomes a Bodily Pattern

Suppose a child repeatedly learns that disagreement brings humiliation, anger, or rejection. Years later, they may consciously know that a new relationship is safe while still noticing a tight jaw, held breath, or throat pressure when they need to disagree. The present situation is different, but the nervous system has encountered a pattern that resembles something it learned before.

This is one useful way to understand the phrase the body stores trauma. Trauma means an experience that is overwhelming enough to leave lasting effects on how a person responds later. The memory is not literally packed into one muscle like an object placed inside a drawer. What persists is an organization of expectation and response: certain cues become linked with danger, protection becomes easier to activate, and the body can reproduce parts of the old response when something similar appears. A meta-analysis of PTSD research found measurable physiological responses to trauma reminders, including changes in heart rate, skin conductance, and facial muscle activity [7].

Research on persistent physical symptoms shows the same relationship from another direction. A meta-analysis of 71 studies found that reported psychological trauma was associated with greater odds of several functional somatic syndromes, including irritable bowel syndrome and fibromyalgia [8]. A meta-analysis combines results from many studies to look for a larger pattern. The finding does not mean that every physical symptom is caused by trauma, but it does show that psychological history and bodily experience cannot be cleanly separated.

Once a response is learned, the body can become a record of what the person has not consciously revisited. A shoulder may tense before the person admits how responsible they feel. The stomach may change before they identify what they are afraid to accept. The throat may react before they recognize that they are holding something back. At this point we know that psychological experience can become bodily response, but another question remains: are these reactions distributed randomly, or do different emotions and meanings tend to appear in different bodily patterns?

5. Emotions Take Shape in the Body

If people are asked where they feel anger, fear, sadness, love, or happiness, they do not point everywhere equally. In 2014, Lauri Nummenmaa and colleagues asked 701 participants across five experiments to mark human silhouettes showing where they felt increases or decreases in bodily activity during different emotions. When the responses were combined, different emotions produced distinguishable bodily maps [9].

A later study involving 3,954 adults from 101 countries found substantial similarity in these reported maps across populations [10]. The studies measured people's reported bodily experience rather than directly measuring every organ or tissue they colored, so they do not prove that each emotion has one fixed biological address. What they establish is simpler and more important for this paper: emotion is already experienced through patterned bodily geography rather than as something that exists only in abstract thought.

Now imagine two people who both describe themselves as anxious. One is afraid to tell the truth, while the other is afraid that someone they love will leave. The general emotional label is the same, yet the meaning of the anxiety is different. If emotional states already have bodily shapes, the next question becomes whether the particular meaning of an experience can help shape where and how it is felt.

Human beings have another reason to organize meaning through the body: the body is the structure through which we first learn what actions such as holding, carrying, seeing, speaking, standing, moving, taking in, and letting go actually mean.

6. Why Location Could Carry Meaning

Long before a child understands an abstract word such as responsibility, they understand what it feels like to carry something. Long before they can explain vulnerability, they know what it means to expose or protect the front of the body. They learn that hands grasp and release, feet move them from one place to another, the mouth takes things in and sends words out, the eyes see, and the shoulders bear weight.

Those physical experiences become part of how people think and speak. We do not merely say that a breakup is emotionally painful; people often describe an ache in the heart or chest. Anxiety becomes a knot in the stomach. Something unsaid becomes a lump in the throat. Responsibility becomes weight on the shoulders. We speak of swallowing words, being unable to stomach an idea, standing our ground, losing our footing, seeing someone's point, reaching for connection, holding on, letting go, and moving forward. The body keeps appearing in emotional language because physical function gives shape to experiences that would otherwise be difficult to locate or describe.

Researchers use the term embodied cognition for the broader idea that thinking is shaped partly by the body's systems for sensing and acting rather than occurring independently of them. A metaphor uses one kind of experience to understand another. Responsibility has no literal weight, yet weight becomes a natural way to understand it because carrying is already part of bodily life. Reviews of metaphor research find evidence that sensory and motor systems can contribute to the way some abstract concepts are understood [11]. A 2024 experiment even found that placing physical load on participants' shoulders influenced decisions involving responsibility [12]. That result is narrow, but it shows that the relationship between physical function and abstract meaning can extend beyond figures of speech.

This gives bodily location a possible logic. The throat does not have to be arbitrarily assigned to expression because speech actually passes through it. Hands do not have to be arbitrarily assigned to action because they are how we handle, give, receive, build, touch, and manipulate the world. Legs and feet are involved in movement and direction. Shoulders literally carry weight. The stomach breaks down and assimilates what enters the body. Physical function already supplies the mind with a vocabulary.

If subconscious processing needs to make an experience felt before it can be explained, the body offers a ready-made symbolic system whose meanings have been learned through a lifetime of using it.

7. Many Traditions Built Maps From the Same Body

The idea that different parts of the body correspond to different parts of human experience appears in many traditions, although the systems do not agree on every detail and they do not all make the same kind of claim. Their value here is not that age makes an interpretation true. It is that independent or partially independent systems can be compared with one another and with the ordinary functions of the body.

Yoga and tantric traditions developed chakra maps in which different bodily centers were associated with domains such as grounding, sexuality, power, love, expression, insight, and spiritual connection. Traditional Chinese Medicine linked organ systems with emotional patterns, including heart and joy, liver and anger, lungs and grief, spleen and worry, and kidneys and fear [13]. Reichian traditions described seven broad segments of muscular armoring - ocular, oral, cervical, thoracic, diaphragmatic, abdominal, and pelvic - and treated chronic holding as part of psychological defense [14]. Somatic psychotherapies widened the focus to breathing, posture, tension, movement, and internal sensation without always assigning fixed meanings to every location.

Reflexology and acupressure traditions created still other maps of significant locations on the body. Their proposed organ-specific effects are not established in the same way as modern anatomical relationships, and the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health notes that reflexology has not been proven to produce the organ-specific healing effects often claimed for it [15]. Metaphysical symptom dictionaries go further by assigning symbolic meanings to regions such as shoulders, knees, throat, back, and chest. These are useful as sources of hypotheses, but repeated ideas across books may reflect shared culture or borrowing as well as separate observation.

The working map used in this paper was therefore built from overlap rather than from loyalty to one tradition. It compares chakra and yogic maps, Traditional Chinese Medicine, reflexology and zone maps, Reichian and bioenergetic bodywork, somatic psychotherapy, metaphysical symptom systems, functional anatomy, and embodied metaphor, then gives greater weight to meanings that recur across several sources or follow clearly from what the body part physically does [16].

The agreement is strongest at the broad level. Finer assignments - one particular finger, toe, side of the waist, or small region of the mouth - have less independent support and should be treated with correspondingly less confidence. The map itself marks several of these lower-consensus areas. That difference matters because a useful language needs both vocabulary and uncertainty: some words are familiar, while others remain provisional.

Once these recurring domains are placed beside interoception, bodily emotion maps, learned physical responses, and embodied meaning, the body begins to look less like a random collection of symptoms and more like a possible communication system.

8. From Reaction to Language

A language does not communicate through vocabulary alone. The word hold changes meaning depending on what follows it: hold a hand, hold a door, hold back, hold together. Bodily communication can be approached the same way. The location may tell us what area of experience is active, while the quality of the sensation tells us what is happening within that area.

Take the throat. If the broad domain is expression, pressure in the throat may feel like expression demanding attention or pushing toward release. Tightness in the same location may fit restriction, control, or holding back. Heaviness may fit the weight of what remains unsaid. Tingling may fit activation or readiness, while a sense of release may accompany permission to express. The body part stays the same while the sensation changes the message.

The working map uses this same structure throughout the body. Pressure generally adds demand or force. Tightness adds restriction, bracing, or control. Heaviness adds burden or weight. Density adds concentrated significance. Pain adds friction or hurt. Numbness adds disconnection or reduced access. Heat adds intensity. Cold adds withdrawal. Warmth often fits safety, compassion, or opening. Tingling often fits activation, sensitivity, or readiness [16].

These are not medical definitions of the sensations. They are symbolic modifiers, much like tone of voice changes the meaning of spoken words. A sentence whispered gently and the same sentence shouted angrily contain identical vocabulary but do not communicate the same experience. Location supplies part of the vocabulary; sensation supplies part of the tone.

The side of the body adds another proposed modifier in the working map. The center or midline is used for the core theme, the left side for more internal, personal, receptive, or receiving experience, and the right for more outward, active, giving, or world-facing experience [16]. This left-right distinction is one of the map's working conventions rather than a rule established by neuroanatomy, so personal patterns matter more than forcing an interpretation to fit it.

At this point the idea that has been developing through the evidence can finally be stated plainly: the body may function as a language through which subconscious experience becomes available to conscious awareness. The body region can suggest the subject, the sensation can describe what is happening within that subject, and the person's circumstances can reveal what the message is actually about.

A symbolic reading therefore becomes most useful when all of those pieces converge. Throat tightness alone is ambiguous. Throat tightness that repeatedly appears when the same person withholds an important truth is far more informative. The pattern, not the isolated sensation, is what begins to teach the language.

9. The Body Can Answer With Movement

Sensation is not the only thing that can occur before conscious explanation. The body also moves. A hand rises to the chest, arms fold, a jaw clenches, one leg begins bouncing, fingers tap, the back of the neck is rubbed, or the body leans away before the person has deliberately chosen a symbolic gesture.

These movements become especially interesting when read as actions directed toward the domains already identified in the body map. Folding the arms across the chest physically places the arms - structures used to hold, protect, embrace, and push away - over a region associated with emotion and vulnerability. The same posture can therefore function as protection, containment, or self-support. It can also simply mean that the person is cold or comfortable. The movement gives us a possible function; context tells us whether that function belongs to the moment.

A restless leg provides a different pattern. The legs and feet are built for movement, yet a bouncing leg repeatedly produces motion without taking the person anywhere. During anticipation, impatience, or restrained action, that can look almost like movement being expressed while movement is not yet possible. Again, the behavior is not a universal code. Fidgeting can support concentration, arise from habit, or reflect physical causes. What makes it meaningful is a repeated relationship between the movement and the person's experience.

Touching another part of the body may add still more information because the hands are the body's main tools for deliberate contact. A palm placed over the chest can bring warmth and pressure to emotional discomfort. A hand over the mouth can physically contain expression. Holding the opposite wrist can steady or restrain action. Rubbing the forehead can direct soothing contact toward a region involved in effortful thinking and interpretation.

This creates a useful distinction. Sensation may reveal what is active; automatic movement or posture may reveal how the body is responding to what is active. The throat can tighten while the mouth is covered. The chest can become heavy while the arms fold around it. The legs can feel activated while the person remains seated. Several parts of the body can therefore participate in one communication at the same time.

10. Several Body Parts Can Form One Message

Return to the person preparing to say something difficult. Their throat tightens, their arms fold across their chest, and one foot begins bouncing. Each reaction is ambiguous by itself. Together, in a situation where the person wants to reveal something emotionally important but fears the response, the pattern becomes more coherent. The throat points toward expression, the arms may be protecting the emotional center, and the foot may be expressing movement or readiness that has not yet become action.

Another person may feel heaviness in the chest while gripping the opposite wrist. The first part of the pattern can fit emotional weight; the second can fit containment of action. A third may notice forehead pressure while rubbing the temples and repeatedly shifting their feet during a difficult decision. Interpretation, self-soothing, and uncertainty about direction are all participating in the same moment.

The important point is not that every combination has a fixed translation. Human language itself depends on context. The word fine can mean excellent, acceptable, delicate, or a penalty depending on the sentence around it. Bodily language may work the same way. The map provides recurring meanings, but the person's life supplies the sentence.

This is also why the system is better suited to self-understanding than to reading strangers. Folded arms cannot prove defensiveness, a bouncing foot cannot prove that someone wants to leave, and a hand on the chest cannot prove grief. An observer can see the movement but not the full context, memories, sensations, and associations that give it meaning. The person living inside the body has access to the rest of the sentence.

11. Learning an Individual Dialect

Every language has shared rules and individual habits. Two people can speak the same language while choosing different words, rhythms, and expressions. The body's language may have the same structure. Broad meanings may be shared because human bodies perform broadly similar functions, while personal history teaches each nervous system which locations and reactions become especially important.

One person may consistently feel withheld expression in the throat. Another may notice it more strongly in the jaw. Someone else may feel it in the chest because the central issue is not speaking itself but the fear of what speaking could do to a relationship. A general map can point toward possible meanings, but repetition within the same person is what turns a possibility into a useful personal pattern.

The most useful way to learn that pattern is to begin with observation rather than interpretation. Notice the exact location. Notice the sensation quality. Notice which side is involved. Notice what the body is doing at the same time. Then return to the moment immediately before the reaction. What person, thought, memory, decision, or interaction was present? What changed when the sensation changed? Does the same bodily pattern return when the same psychological theme returns?

Over time, the person can compare the body's message with what later becomes consciously clear. A sensation that repeatedly appears before the same realization becomes more informative than one that can be explained differently every time. The aim is not to force meaning into the body. It is to discover whether the body has already been using a pattern consistently enough that its meaning can be learned.

Physical causes still remain physical causes. A symbolic interpretation does not erase injury, illness, medication effects, fatigue, neurological conditions, or ordinary bodily needs. The map becomes most useful when it adds another layer of understanding rather than replacing the body with symbolism.

12. The Direction of Communication Matters

This paper has followed one direction of the relationship: subconscious processing becomes bodily sensation, posture, or movement, and those physical changes can make something available to conscious awareness. The body is being read as an expression of an internal process.

But the relationship does not end there. Anyone who deliberately slows their breathing, unclenches their jaw, stands differently, stretches, curls inward, opens the chest, or changes the position of the body has already encountered the reverse possibility. Physical form can change the conditions in which consciousness operates.

That reverse direction belongs to the next paper in the series. If the body can express an internal state, then posture, movement, breath, and physical form may not merely display consciousness; they may also participate in changing it. The body can be both message and method. Before following that second direction, however, the first one gives us something immediately useful: the possibility that sensations and automatic movements are not meaningless interruptions but early access to processes that conscious language has not yet caught up with.

13. When the Body Speaks

The argument began with an ordinary experience: the body changes before the explanation arrives. That small delay opens a much larger picture. The nervous system processes vastly more information than deliberate awareness can inspect. The body already communicates internal states outward through posture, movement, expression, voice, and other nonverbal cues, while other nervous systems can begin reading those cues without deliberate analysis. Interoception gives bodily change a route back into the person's own awareness. Earlier experiences can teach the body protective responses that return before a person consciously recognizes what has been activated. Emotions already appear as patterned bodily experiences, and human language repeatedly uses bodily function to describe psychological meaning.

Across psychological, somatic, medical-traditional, spiritual, and metaphoric systems, the same broad regions repeatedly acquire similar meanings: the throat and expression, the chest and emotional connection, the shoulders and burden, the abdomen and assimilation, the hands and action, the lower body and movement or support. The agreement is incomplete, especially in smaller regions, but it is coherent enough to build a working map from the overlap.

That map becomes more useful when sensation is treated as part of the message rather than as a separate event. Location can suggest what area of experience is active; pressure, tightness, heaviness, warmth, tingling, numbness, pain, or release can describe the condition of that area; movement and posture can show how the body is responding; and context can connect the pattern with the person's actual life.

The result is not a dictionary in which every ache has one hidden meaning. It is closer to learning a language already being spoken. At first a person notices isolated signals. With repetition, familiar combinations begin to stand out. Eventually a physical change can become recognizable as the beginning of an emotional or subconscious process before the process has fully become words.

The conscious mind may therefore be late without being excluded. The body can bring the first part of the message forward, and conscious attention can finish the translation.

When the body speaks, the task is not to invent a meaning for it. The task is to learn whether it has been saying the same thing all along.

Sources

[1] Zheng, J., & Meister, M. (2025). The unbearable slowness of being: Why do we live at 10 bits/s? Neuron, 113(2), 192-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2024.11.008

[2] Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feel - now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2555

[3] Hall, J. A., Horgan, T. G., & Murphy, N. A. (2019). Nonverbal Communication. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 271-294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103145

[4] Mehrabian, A., & Ferris, S. R. (1967). Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31(3), 248-252. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024648

[5] Mehrabian, A., & Wiener, M. (1967). Decoding of inconsistent communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6(1), 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024532

[6] de Gelder, B., de Borst, A. W., & Watson, R. (2015). The perception of emotion in body expressions. WIREs Cognitive Science, 6(2), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1335

[7] Pole, N. (2007). The psychophysiology of posttraumatic stress disorder: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 133(5), 725-746. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.725

[8] Afari, N., Ahumada, S. M., Wright, L. J., Mostoufi, S., Golnari, G., Reis, V., & Cuneo, J. G. (2014). Psychological trauma and functional somatic syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychosomatic Medicine, 76(1), 2-11. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000010

[9] Nummenmaa, L., Glerean, E., Hari, R., & Hietanen, J. K. (2014). Bodily maps of emotions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(2), 646-651. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1321664111

[10] Volynets, S., Glerean, E., Hietanen, J. K., Hari, R., & Nummenmaa, L. (2020). Bodily maps of emotions are culturally universal. Emotion, 20(7), 1127-1136. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000624

[11] Desai, R. H. (2022). Are metaphors embodied? The neural evidence. Psychological Research, 86, 2417-2433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01604-4

[12] Shahabifar, S., Yazdanpanah, A., & Vahabie, A.-H. (2024). The effect of an embodied intervention on responsibility: Put a load on one's shoulder. Cognitive Processing, 25(4), 613-620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-024-01207-y

[13] The Chinese Medicine Hospital of Hong Kong. The Five Zang Organs and Emotional-mental Activity. https://www.cmhhk.org.hk/en/about_us/cmculturedisplays/zangxiang_emotionsandzangfu/

[14] Institute for Orgonomic Science. Dr. Herskowitz's lecture on the seven segments of armoring (1993 lecture transcript). https://orgonomicscience.org/dr-herskowitzs-lecture-in-germany-december-1993-2/

[15] National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Reflexology. https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/reflexology

[16] Consensus Body Location & Sensation Quick Reference, v5. Working map synthesized from chakra/yogic subtle-body maps, Traditional Chinese Medicine organ-emotion and meridian theory, reflexology/zone maps, Reichian and bioenergetic segmental armoring, somatic psychotherapy/body-mapping literature, metaphysical symptom dictionaries, functional anatomy, and embodied metaphor. Reproduced in full in Appendix A.

Appendix A: The Complete Working Body Map